This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LibiBamizrach (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 10 September 2010 (→Email: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:28, 10 September 2010 by LibiBamizrach (talk | contribs) (→Email: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| 8:15 pm, 27 December 2024 (PDT) Tiptoety's userpage | talk | e-mail | contribs | subpages | edit count | awards | adoption program | ||||||||||||||||||
Welcome, new CheckUserCongratulations, your CheckUser rights are activated and ready for use. Before use, please ensure you are familiar with our CheckUser policy and our privacy policy The list administrator for checkuser-l has been informed of your new status and will allow you to join the list. When performing a checkuser with potential cross-wiki complications, please use the list to coordinate your activities with checkusers across other projects. If you use IRC, please contact an op for access to #wikimedia-privacy and #wikimedia-checkuser. Again, congratulations. Kylu (talk) 03:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for identifying the Sockpuppets causing trouble on the Vera Baird article. Was really getting fed up of their edits.--Shakehandsman (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC) Hello
Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages a better place Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 11:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC). Rollback...Hi Tiptoety, I saw that you were one of the administrators willing to grant rollback requests. I would like to have rollback as I think that it could help my edits. I have plenty of edits and I feel it would help me a lot. Many thanks, Rock drum Ba-dum (Driving well?) 19:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Re: Recent unblock requestI try to keep an eye on my recent blocks in case someone requests unblock, but I do appreciate the notification of others to help make sure I stay abreast of that. I've taken your consideration up and given the user another chance. It looked to me like an attempt to dodge WP:3RR, but honestly the user's explanation doesn't seem unreasonable and they were quite up-front about it. - Vianello (Talk) 23:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Sockpuppet case - Graham1973You just classified or at least marked and blocked indefinitely Graham1973 as sock-puppet of King kong92, can it be possible you had a false positive? He is known already for many years inside the Orbiter community, and there actually no overlap in the contributions of greengobby92 and him, as you have usually for sock-puppets of one and the same person & brain. The evidence chain appears very weak from what I can see, but I also have no access to the full evidence data as non-administrator on WP, that you based your decision on. Would you mind taking a closer look at the case? Urwumpe (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Sent you urgent email. LibiBamizrach (talk) 04:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||
and a warm welcome back to Hersfold!
Done -