Misplaced Pages

User talk:Danteferno

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Parasti (talk | contribs) at 09:39, 9 February 2006 (Arbcom case evidence.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:39, 9 February 2006 by Parasti (talk | contribs) (Arbcom case evidence.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Attention!

If you have inquiries or disagreements about my edits, please only use this board to direct me to the discussion area for said article. Thank you.

Danteferno 11:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your support of the mall goth article, it's been under a rather sustained attack by people who seem to think wikipedia needs to conform to there own standards of notability. Its not my article but it really upsets me the way most of the administration think that making a comprehensive encyclopedia involves deleting 100's of articles.--Pypex 14:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Archive-1

Image:Fotosleep3.jpg

If that is the case, a {{promophoto}} will do just fine. Here, there you go.SoothingR 21:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Leyasu

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Leyasu. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Leyasu/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Leyasu/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

About the evidence on this case, it's generally preferred to use links to diffs, and not links to the history of articles, or section links to talk pages. These links have a tendency of becoming worthless after a few months, and often people go back and look at an RFAr long after it's finished. :) --Phroziac . o º 13:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Paradiselostphoto.jpg

The problem is that you have no source to back up the claim that this is a promo photo. I removed the no source tag because I believe it is a promo photo but someone else may challenge its validity in the future. If you want the image to stay you need to cite the source of the image -Regards Nv8200p talk 02:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

That will help. Add that info to the image description page. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 02:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Hello, there is a request for mediation open between you, Leyasu, and Parasti here. If you are open to mediation with me as the mediator, all via email, drop me a note on my user talk page. --Improv 02:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Arbcom case evidence.

Hi, I just wanted to say that I registered on December 4th (or 3rd, depends on where you live), as seen in my contribs , so would be nice if you fixed that. Thanks. -- parasti  09:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)