Misplaced Pages

User talk:OttaSotta

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Voice of Clam (talk | contribs) at 05:22, 18 October 2010 (→Please unblock account that is obviously not a sockpuppet: Comment and question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:22, 18 October 2010 by Voice of Clam (talk | contribs) (→Please unblock account that is obviously not a sockpuppet: Comment and question)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, OttaSotta, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Block notice

Please do not abuse multiple accounts. I have disabled this account, as it is obviously a sock of User:Jonas Poole. Parsecboy (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I would like to use this account again. As I said, this account is not a socketpuppet, nor have I ever intended to use it as such. Could someone please remove this ban. I've got exploration articles I'd like to eventually edit. OttaSotta (talk) 04:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I would like to be UNBLOCKED now

This user is the owner of multiple Misplaced Pages accounts in a manner permitted by policy.

See also:

WP:SOCK#NOTIFY

No one's told me what templates exactly I need to put here, so I have no idead what I'm doing. I would like to use this account again to edit exploration articles in peace. OttaSotta (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Please unblock account that is obviously not a sockpuppet

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
OttaSotta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
99.67.56.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

I’m really tired of this. This has already been shown NOT to be a sock account. Please remove block

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Shown where? Certainly, this account and User:Jonas Poole are editing from the same computer. What's your explanation? --jpgordon 04:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

OttaSotta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive Socking Jonas Poole) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done nothing wrong.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive ]) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done ''nothing'' wrong. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive ]) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done ''nothing'' wrong. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive ]) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done ''nothing'' wrong. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(Comment to other reviewers - ANI discussion referred to is here).
Otta/Jonas, since you admit you're the same person, can you explain why you need this second account? —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 05:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Category: