Misplaced Pages

talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ocaasi (talk | contribs) at 05:14, 26 October 2010 (Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:14, 26 October 2010 by Ocaasi (talk | contribs) (Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity

Ludwigs suggested the FAQ might need to be brought in line with recent changes to NPOV. I wanted to just do a non-policy clean-up first to get a better idea of what we were dealing with. I generally just shortened phrases and clarified the language to be more direct. I left ASF and Pseudoscience alone, since they are more touchy at the moment. QG made the comment that the FAQ had been "weakened", but I think that is a misreading of the change. I'm curious if there are some more specific comments or other observations. Ocaasi (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)