Talk:September 11 attacks - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.89.59.40 (talk) at 16:52, 1 November 2010 (9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:52, 1 November 2010 by 174.89.59.40 (talk) (9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about September 11 attacks. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about September 11 attacks at the Reference desk.

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the September 11 attacks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Template:September 11 arbcom

view · edit Frequently asked questions

Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning the September 11 attacks.

To view an explanation to the answer, click the link to the right of the question.

Q1: Is the article biased against conspiracy theories? A1: Misplaced Pages is a mainstream encyclopedia so this article presents the accepted version of the events according to reliable sources. Although reliable sources have repeatedly reported on conspiracy theories, reporting on conspiracy theories is not the same thing as advocating conspiracy theories or accepting them as fact. The most recent discussion that resulted in the current consensus took place on this talk page in December 2011. If you disagree with the current status, you are welcome to bring your concerns to the article talk page. Please read the previous discussions on this talk page and try to explain how your viewpoint provides new arguments or information that may lead to a change in consensus. Please be sure to be polite and support your views with citations from reliable sources. Q2: Should the article use the word "terrorist" (and related words)? A2: Misplaced Pages:Words to watch states that "there are no forbidden words or expressions on Misplaced Pages". That being said, "terrorism" is a word that requires extra attention when used in Misplaced Pages. The consensus, after several lengthy discussions, is that it is appropriate to use the term in a limited fashion to describe the attacks and the executors of these attacks. The contributors have arrived at this conclusion after looking at the overwhelming majority of reliable sources that use this term as well as the United Nations' own condemnation of the attacks.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Template:WikiProject September 11Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Virginia: Northern Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Northern Virginia Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Top‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skyscrapers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Template:WP1.0

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

September 11 attacks is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2004	Refreshing brilliant prose	Kept
February 26, 2004	Featured article review	Demoted
January 10, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
December 29, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
January 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
February 14, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 16, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
May 29, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
July 10, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
August 20, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
June 19, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Former featured article

A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on September 11, 2004, September 11, 2005, September 11, 2006, and September 11, 2009.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the September 11 attacks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Edit Request

{{edit semi-protected}} Can somebody please change the opening sentence to: The September 11 attacks (often referred to as September 11th or 9/11) were a series of controversial coordinated suicide attacks by al-Qaeda upon the United States on September 11, 2001.

Sources: , , ,

The attacks are very controversial, and many citizens and politicians alike are still divided over this issue. I would like to see this expanded on in a new or pre-existing section since this is on topic and sourced. Thank you for your co-operation. 76.68.52.131 (talk) 18:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

No.--MONGO 19:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The above IP...76.68.52.131 comes from the same location as blocked IP 174.89.58.95...check it out for yourselves...here...and...here--MONGO 19:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

As I said above, it may just be time to block unregistered users from editing the talk page. It's pretty clear that the IP in question isn't going to be giving up and isn't getting the message that we won't be preforming the modifications he keeps requesting. --Tarage (talk) 11:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

That's fine, I'll just keep returning until somebody fixes the article's neutrality. Everyone who comes to read this article knows how biased it is anyway - that is, the people who aren't brainwashed by America. Cheers. 174.89.59.40 (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!

Categories: