Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jehochman

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tothwolf (talk | contribs) at 19:45, 12 November 2010 (→Harassment of Tothwolf by Theserialcomma: Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:45, 12 November 2010 by Tothwolf (talk | contribs) (→Harassment of Tothwolf by Theserialcomma: Comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NoticeWelcome to Jehochman's Talk Page
Please feel free to put your feet on the coffee table, and speak candidly. Or for more better relaxation, stretch yourself luxuriously on the chaise longue in Bishzilla's Victorian parlour and mumble incoherently.

User talk:Jehochman/Archive index

User_talk:LemonMonday#November_2010

Hello, could you as the previous blocking admin comment? Thanks,  Sandstein  07:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Sorry again Jehochman but this needs an eye kept on it. I know LM was unblocked stating that they'd raise an RFC on the whole 'British Isles thing' but this as it is currenly presented is an assumption of bad faith cast in a battleground mentality. I have noted to LM at the RFC the issues with it including the lack of evidence; incorrect categorization of the RFC; repetetion of the question asked at the page's recent MFD; and I would ask, as I will be away for the next few days, that this be reviewed over the next 72 hours. LM deserves the chance to reformat the RFC in line with policy within a reasonable period of time but if this is not done or if there is undue delay fixing the POINTY issues I see this as a violation of WP:DE and the terms of LM's two recent unblockings. I will be notifying TWOFR and Sarek of Vulcan of this post--Cailil 15:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

"Premature" Submission

FYI, the situation here, which you participated in, has been resolved. I expected one of the admin coordinators would have seen my reminder on our noticeboard and would have deleted it before it was noticed by anyone else. Sorry for the confusion, Sven Manguard Talk 19:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I am disappointed that you're not running.  :-( Jehochman 20:54, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Oh, I actually think I'd do a bang up job, but I've only had an account for a month. I'd be laughed out of contention. By the way, can you do me a favor and take that rap from my "submission" and place it in User:Sven Manguard/Sandbox? I really want it back. Sven Manguard Talk 23:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Here you are rap. Jehochman 00:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
That was far too simple for me to figure out on my own. Thanks. Sven Manguard Talk 00:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Harassment of Tothwolf by Theserialcomma

Hello there. I happened to notice that Theserialcomma has been on Tothwolf's case again. I considered filing an arbitration request personally, but all the formatting and templates and instructions there made my head spin, so I decided to come to you instead based on this from the amendment request.

Theserialcomma has been editing Eggdrop again. All of his edits are removal of content, and most are reverted by editors uninvolved with the dispute between Theserialcomma and Tothwolf. This can be seen from the history. He also has been repeatedly accusing Tothwolf of COI in his edit summaries and on the talk page of Eggdrop and the talk page of previously uninvolved IRCWolfie . Also this personal attack, after it was found in the arbitration amendment request that boomeranged on Miami33139 that repeatedly calling someone "paranoid" is a personal attack. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Theserialcomma posted a highly offensive rant after I blocked them. They most likely will not be returning. Jehochman 11:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
On a related note, could someone have a look over the Eggdrop article and let me know of any potential NPOV issues from my adding sources and citations? I don't think I violated the neutral point of view policy, and no one other than Theserialcomma has ever really taken any issues with my edits, but a few extra pairs of eyes to check it over would still be good. --Tothwolf (talk) 11:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea. Ask User:DGG for help or start a thread at WP:COIN. Jehochman 11:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Will do, thanks! --Tothwolf (talk) 03:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Still on the subject of Theserialcomma, I'd like to ask your opinion on whether this is worth filing an SPI over. After you blocked TSC, he claimed he'd already registered a new user account.

I mentioned above how Theserialcomma and I crossed paths at Tucker Max. Duke jd made his first wikipedia edit to that article. While new users frequently head straight to that article, this particular one has done something further that makes me suspect it is TSC reincarnated. I'd rather not describe it publicly lest he take note and edit differently to avoid scrutiny, but I'm calling DUCK.

Anyway, if it is TSC, he'd be dodging a block. Seth Kellerman (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

While I previously had no reason to go looking, after the recent sockpuppetry threat and one previously, I did some checking and there appears to be a pattern of sockpuppetry that goes back to at least 2007. Per WP:LTA the details probably shouldn't be posted on-wiki (at least not yet) but feel free to ping me via email and I'll provide some links and diffs. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
flag Redflag I am not a checkuser. You need one. Hello, do I have a friendly talk page stalker with checkuser ops? Jehochman 00:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I guess there aren't any lurking about? What should be done with all this material? It really doesn't seem to be the sort of thing that should be posted on WP:SPI. --Tothwolf (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I've emailed the material to functionaries-en. --Tothwolf (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Climate change

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I mention you in this request for clarification of the ArbCom Climate Change case. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I think people have tested limits enough; I wish they'd stop. Jehochman 21:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

@Polargeo: Are you still allowed to talk about CC, or have you been topic banned? I can't bother to check right now, but when I come back, I will, and if your names are on the list of topic banned editors, I will block you if your comments are still here on my talk page. This page is not to be misused. Get it? Jehochman 12:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
@Polargeo: Maybe I'm joking, maybe I'm not. Jehochman 13:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
@Polargeo: Just one question: are you topic banned from climate change, or not? Please answer with a maximum of three and a minimum of two characters (e.g. Yes or No). Thank you! Jehochman 13:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I didn't block you did I? Humorous and sarcastic comments are welcome, but I get to be the judge! Haw, my talk page, my rules. Jehochman grins wickedly. Jehochman 14:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Evil. Polargeo (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I can't wait until my kids see the next Harry Patter movie. When we get them home and put them to bed, I am going to practice my Voldemort imitations. Jehochman 14:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:

Not on behalf of ArbCom, but as a public service announcement... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Notice - COI discussion

Please see Misplaced Pages:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User_THF_and_subject_Arthur_Alan_Wolk. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Now also at WP:ANI due to issues involving No Legal Threats. -- Cirt (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Jehochman, this arose because you made a false accusation that I violated WP:COI. As WP:COIN states, Please note that the conflict of interest guidelines do not require editors with conflicts of interest to avoid editing altogether. An editor who has disclosed a conflict is complying with the guideline when they discuss proposed changes on a talk page. Since I did not edit mainspace and since I disclosed my conflict of interest, I did not violate WP:COI. Cirt has made false allegations about me to three message boards in retaliation for an editing dispute at Talk:Werner_Erhard_vs._Columbia_Broadcasting_System#WP:COATRACK. Can you stop his harassment, please? I also need oversight, because his false accusation could result in another meritless lawsuit against me (this very real concern of mine is what Cirt is caling a "legal threat"). THF (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

THF continues to make veiled legal threats on multiple pages. Jehochman, my WP:COIN report only references on-Misplaced Pages comments, from THF himself. -- Cirt (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2010 (UTC)