This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Serpent's Choice (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 30 November 2010 (→Requests for arbitration: section prep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:38, 30 November 2010 by Serpent's Choice (talk | contribs) (→Requests for arbitration: section prep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
<Insert the case name> | 30 November 2010 | {{{votes}}} | |
WikipediaExperts | 29 November 2010 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Requests for arbitration
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
<Insert the case name>-Requests_for_arbitration-2010-11-30T16:38:00.000Z">
Initiated by Serpent's Choice (talk) at 16:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)"> ">
Involved parties">
- username1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- username2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- username3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- username4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Diff. 1
- Diff. 2
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by {Party 1}">
Statement by {Party 2}">
Statement by {Party 3}">
Clerk notes">
- This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)">
WikipediaExperts
Initiated by Sophie at 20:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Can not be done because of the nature.
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Can not be done because of the nature.
Statement by {Party 1}
I am guessing this me so, was recomended that this be posted here from Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WikipediaExperts
In user:Alpha_Quadrant's irc channel, he posted a website which allows users to pay $99 to get their atricle into wikipedia. WikipediaExperts.com has to have users here on Misplaced Pages and I am sure there will be sock accounts as well. Can we get a check for them? The ip from Whois says the IP for the site is 173.230.132.153.
Thanks - Sophie 20:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Regarding this, if this were to happen and bussinesses start using Misplaced Pages for profit it would essentially undermine Misplaced Pages's founding purpose. --Alpha Quadrant 20:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Their FAQs |
---|
Q: Do I have full control over the content of the article? A: Yes. This is the case in the sense that we won’t post any article without your approval, and that you can later make any modifications to the article on your own. However, under Misplaced Pages rules, we are required to do our own research and submit a balanced article based on multiple sources. Misplaced Pages articles are NOT press-releases or advertorials written by the company or its ad agency. As specified in Misplaced Pages Pillars: “Misplaced Pages has a neutral point of view. We strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view, presenting each point of view accurately and in context, and not presenting any point of view as "the truth" or "the best view." All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy: unreferenced material may be removed, so please provide references. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong here. That means citing verifiable, authoritative sources, especially on controversial topics and when the subject is a living person. When conflict arises over neutrality, discuss details on the talk page, and follow dispute resolution.” Q: Are there subjects not admissible to Misplaced Pages? A: Yes, and they are best summed up in another of the five Misplaced Pages Pillars: “Misplaced Pages is an online encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, an indiscriminate collection of information, or a web directory. It is not a dictionary, newspaper, or a collection of source documents.” Q: Do you guarantee the articles you write will be accepted by Misplaced Pages? A: We guarantee that we will submit professional content, consistent with Misplaced Pages rules and standards; however, Misplaced Pages does not have a central acceptance authority that makes a final conclusion about the admissibility of articles. An article may be flagged, edited and removed at any time by any user or administrator. In such cases, we will make the necessary changes and resubmit it until it is accepted. Q: How long does it take you to learn that someone’s modified an article? A: We receive alerts instantaneously. Q: What’s included in your writing services? A: The writing service includes: * Necessary research needed, including an analysis of your website and other materials you may provide including related media coverage * Article creation in compliance with Misplaced Pages rules, and adjusting the article should it be refused by Misplaced Pages * The $295 introduction package covers up to five hours of work. This is enough to complete most articles. If extra work is required, we apply our standard billing rate of $95/hour, with the detailed verifiable time reporting via our Transparent Billing application.
* Monitoring of your article by our proprietary software * Immediate intervention by our staff in case brand -damaging content is posted * Content updates whenever your company’s situation changes * The $99 fee covers up to two hours of work per month. This is enough for most articles. If extra work is required, we apply our standard billing rate of $95/hour, with the detailed verifiable time reporting via our Transparent Billing application. |
See this page for any updates or what ever...
If you reply to me, please note I am 13 so please speak accordingly - Sophie 20:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/5/0/0)
- Comment and decline: Sophie, arbitration is for a dispute that involves specific Misplaced Pages editors or specific disputes that involve only Misplaced Pages editors. WikipediaExperts is an external company that is not part of Misplaced Pages, and the Arbitration Committee has no control over their actions. Just as important, there is no Misplaced Pages policy that forbids editors who are paid to edit. In other words, you have no grounds on which to bring an arbitration case against WikipediaExperts. To other experienced editors and clerks: Perhaps someone could assist Sophie in exploring other methods of gauging community opinion on this question. I note that there was a recent thread on one of the administrative noticeboards relating to this issue. Risker (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Decline at this time. I agree with Risker that there is nothing for the Arbitration Committee to do in this matter, at least not at the present time. I also agree with Risker's other comments. I appreciate Sophie's interest in avoiding problematic types of editing and her calling this issue to our attention as someone else had suggested on ANI. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Decline; while it is unarguable that there is a fair segment of editors who find the very concept of paid editing distasteful, the fact is there is no policy that prohibits it per se nor has past attempts at reaching consensus on the matter met with any success. There may be something to arbitrate if an editor is found to edits inappropriately with a conflict of interest (with or without being paid for it), but at this time we cannot intervene against hypothetical editors, nor would we have a policy-based rationale for doing so. — Coren 01:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Decline - per Risker. KnightLago (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Decline per above. Kirill 01:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)