Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eraserhead1 (talk | contribs) at 13:03, 3 December 2010 (→Your statement to the Arbitration Committee). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Taprobanus
	My Wiki Home		My Talk Page		All My Contributions		Drop Me An Email

1 2 3 4 5 6

Kataragama temple

Hi, just to let you know, you shouldn't cut and paste an article into a new location; instead, you should move that article to preserve its page history. I've asked an administrator to clean up. --JaGa 10:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

It is clear now that you made an error of judgement there, a completely different article has a history from an article that it should not have. Kanatonian (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kataragama temple

Hello, your nomination of Kataragama temple at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 09:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

It was removed here. Probably because of how old the nomination was getting.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Your statement to the Arbitration Committee

Could you please change your statement so that it doesn't make public accusations that YellowMonkey cannot reply to publically. For example, you could limit yourself to what you said at the RFC, that YellowMonkey's edit summary against you had to be oversighted (that much can be seen by anyone). If you don't change the statement yourself, I'll have to ask the clerks to change it. You can always make more detailed allegations to the Committee by email. Physchim62 (talk) 16:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

I came here to mention that even if this arbitration request isn't undertaken doing a WP:OUTING (and multiple times) is an extremely serious accusation and you should email it to Arbcom regardless. Its the only thing here that, assuming there aren't extraneous circumstances, really deserves a ban (per WP:OUTING: Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is grounds for an immediate block.) For all the other accusations made their is a worst case scenario of taking YellowMonkey's tools away for the other stuff.

However I agree with Physchim62 above, and you shouldn't make accusations in public that you can't backup publicly. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

To clarify Eraserhead's point (I don't think the two of us disagree on this): you cannot back up your allegations publically (for obvious reasons), but neither can YellowMonkey defend himself publically (for the same reasons). So please just send your material to ArbCom and restrict your comments to the fact that YellowMonkey's summary had to be oversighted, which is already a serious point in itself. Physchim62 (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Done, I will prepare a detailed case and send it to Arbcomm by e-mail. Kanatonian (talk) 02:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 13:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)