This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Racepacket (talk | contribs) at 07:50, 3 January 2011 (on hold). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:50, 3 January 2011 by Racepacket (talk | contribs) (on hold)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 07:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC) The proper approach is to request a second opinion if you disagree with the review, not to start a review. WP:IAR does not explain your conduct.
- Then I shall withdraw this review as well. Imzadi 1979 → 07:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
You can't avoid a content dispute by repeatedly "withdrawing" a GAN. The question outstanding is how to interpret the sources regarding plans to include I-73 in the 2011 Highway Bill, both in the lead paragraph and in the Future section. If you want a second opinion, please let me know. However, I have spent substantial time on this GA review and I think that we owe it to Misplaced Pages to sort this out. I am placing this on hold.Racepacket (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)