Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arbustoo (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 28 February 2006 (→General user conduct: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• ]

Comment about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

• Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

• Arbustoo Automatically reverting contributions when he assumes a user is a sockpuppet of Jason Gastrich, even if he has no evidence, and even if the contribution doesn't support Gastrich or his web site. User:Jack White1 and myself have left comments on Arbustoo's talk page about his behavior, but he has ignored them and shrugged them off. His most recent response: "Just so Jason Gastrich knows, whenever I see a sock puppet adding his webpage as a citation it will be removed. Arbusto 01:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)" --Juicy Juicy 02:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Juicy Juicy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a sock puppet of Jason Gastrich angry that I remove his weblinks. Proof further of the AfD against him. Arbusto 02:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Happyjoe and associated sockpuppets Insistence on adding this unsourced POV edit despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Young Zaphod – multiple violations of WP:SOCK on multiple vote pages; violations of WP:3RR; problems with WP:NOR. Karnesky 12:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Licorne - accused of persistent and constant POV pushing, personal attacks, and original research. --Fastfission 17:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• 205.240.227.15 Repeated pov vandal. Has been blocked several times. Problems ranging from WP:NPOV to WP:3RR. Athough there has been problems with personal attacks, they are not (so far) part of this RFC, simply due to the shear amount of article-related problems.--Colle|File:Locatecolle.gif|Talk-- 00:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Elerner – User had taken a break, but has now returned under an anonymous username and is continuing to promote the same activities including personal attacks and thwarting Misplaced Pages policy involving content disputes. --ScienceApologist
• Mr j galt – - Problems with WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:NOR, and gaming of WP:3RR, etc. After conducting a multi-front revert war on the Plame affair, Larry Johnson, and Valerie Plame articles that drove all three into protection, the user then extended his attempt to about a dozen articles related to the Plame matter, repeating the very same kinds of edits in order to cast erroneous doubt on the established facts of the case. Any editor challenging him is inevitably accused by Mr j galt of whatever it is he himself has been accused, in a classic Troll style. 22:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• 65.182.172.x – NOTE: The IP 65.182.172.87 has been blocked for one month as of February 6, 2006. User shows repeated pattern of violating WP:AGF, WP:NPA, and Misplaced Pages:Harassment with talk page comments. Has repeatedly posted personally identifying information about Misplaced Pages editors despite having been told not to. - AdelaMae 12:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• 84.59.112.101: Problems with WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:3RR, etc. (long version deleted, is listed in the actual request.) Swatjester 17:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Tina M. Barber: Problems with WP:NPOV, WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. 22:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/United States Congress, POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. Elle _{vécut heureuse} (Be eudaimonic!) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Sgactorny: Has been harrassing other editors who disagree with him on the article AIDS reappraisal. Any edit that refutes his view sets of a tirade of insults from this editor towards other editors. He has been repeatedly warned: ,,

But he persists with the attacks in the talk pages (most of this has been archived) and in his edit summaries. Please help. Nrets 04:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Sarcelles: Mainly WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:V. He has forced at least three Wikipedians to chase after every single one of his edits since April 2005. This has got to stop. -- ran (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Jason Gastrich: Various policies including WP:SOCK, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:NPOV and WP:VAIN. - Just zis  Guy, you know? / AfD? 11:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Now subject to a request for arbitration here. Stifle 17:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Dabljuh: Multiple violations of various policies and guidelines (WP:NPOV, WP:CON, WP:NOR, WP:CIV, WP:V, WP:NPA). Tomer 22:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• NoseNuggets: Refuses to abide by long-standing rules of current-events pages at Current sports events. -- 03:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Theodore7: revert warring against consensus at Astrology and Astronomy, personal attacks. 19:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC).
• Anittas (second RfC) – has made anti-gay statements as well as anti-Jewish and anti-Russian ones. Refuses to apologise. Ronline ✉ 22:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comandante Constantly revert wars without discussing changes on talk. CJK 17:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Robertjkoenig Using wikipedia as a blog to air dissatifaction with a company. Movementarian 19:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Allabout2006 and socks Spamming, incivility, refusal to accept consensus, 3rr, and more on Alkyl nitrites --Heah 04:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Rbj Conducting a hate campaign against users.
• 70.182.219.158 Repeatedly makes vicious personal attacks, makes unsubstantiated (and libelous) accusations of illegal behavior, vandalizes articles, and engages in edit wars. In short, a menace to the wikipedia community.
• Monicasdude 2 Gaming the system (WP:POINT), assuming bad faith(WP:AGF), incivil behavior (WP:CIVIL), harassment (WP:STALK), ignores consensus (WP:CON), and engages in personal attacks (WP:NPA).
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Haizum Repeated personal attacks, refusal to change course

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin - Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

• Ta bu shi da yu (2) – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• February userbox deletion – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire.
• Jeffrey O. Gustafson - regarding attitude towards new contributors unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages. Talrias (t | e | c) 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Snowspinner (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies

List newer entries on top