This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Acalamari (talk | contribs) at 15:11, 25 February 2011 (From me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:11, 25 February 2011 by Acalamari (talk | contribs) (From me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)What happened? Why the sudden blanking?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I assume this has something to do with it. Wish I had known about it, I would have made a statement. SnottyWong 19:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go Jack. N419BH 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Miss you :( --Diannaa 02:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go Jack. N419BH 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
What the hell, Jack? I hope you'll be back in a few days. Otherwise I'll have to follow John Vandenberg's lead and delete my user page as well. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hope to see you around. Don't give them the satisfaction. Protonk (talk) 05:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- What they all said above, Jack. I hope you do come back. This strikes me as a very wrong outcome, and one I hadn't contemplated. Rossrs (talk) 06:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
This sucks. Your contributions and technical know-how are more appreciated around here than you probably know. I hope you reconsider your retirement. Reyk YO! 09:38, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's a shame to see this: I think you're a fine editor, and will miss having you around. I do hope you'll return. Best. Acalamari 15:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)