Misplaced Pages

Anthony Watts (blogger)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RebelRobot (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 6 March 2011 (Robot: Fixing ISBN format). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:24, 6 March 2011 by RebelRobot (talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing ISBN format)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts speaking in Gold Coast, Australia, June 2010
NationalityAmerican
WebsiteWatts Up With That?
SurfaceStations.org

Anthony Watts is an American meteorologist (AMS seal holder, retired), editor of the blog, Watts Up With That? (WUWT), owner of the weather graphics company ItWorks, and founder of the SurfaceStations.org project that documents the siting of weather stations across the United States.

Career

Watts became a television meteorologist in 1987 when he joined WLFI-TV in Lafayette, Indiana, and KHSL-TV, a CBS affiliate based in Chico, California. After working at KHSL for 17 years, he left in 2004 to become the radio meteorologist for KPAY-AM, a Fox News affiliate also based in Chico, California. Watts also operates several companies that make weather graphics systems for use on television broadcasts.

In 2006, Watts was briefly a candidate for county supervisor, to represent Chico on the Butte County Board of Supervisors, but he withdrew his candidacy due to family and workload concerns.

In 2010, Watts went on a speaking tour arranged by the organization Climate Sceptics to 14 locations around Australia. In his talks, Watts presented his views that the temperature records used to support the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming were inaccurate.

View of climate change

Watts has a skeptical view of CO2-driven global warming. He has said that in 1990 he had "been fully engaged in the belief that CO2 was indeed the root cause of the global warming problem," but that he later changed his thinking after learning more about the science and "found it to be lacking." In spite of his climate change skepticism, Watts says that he is "green in many ways."

In 2006 Watts established the blog, Watts Up With That, described by Fred Pearce as the "world's most viewed climate website," which mainly posts about the global warming controversy. In 2008, his blog won the internet voting-based "Best Science Blog" Wizbang Weblog Award.

SurfaceStations.org

In 2007 Watts launched the SurfaceStations.org project, whose mission is to create a publicly available database of photographs of weather stations, along with their metadata, in response to what he described as "a massive failure of bureaucracy to perform something so simple as taking some photographs and making some measurements and notes of a few to a few dozen weather stations in each state". Watts informed radio and television host Glenn Beck that he began the undertaking, wondering if the composition of weather shelter paint had "made a difference" to thermometer readings and, consequently, the U.S. temperature record. The project relies on volunteers to gather the data. Volunteers estimate the siting, usage and other conditions of weather stations in NOAA's Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) and grade them for their compliance with the standards published in the organization's Climate Reference Network Site Handbook. By 2009, the project had documented over 860 stations using over 650 volunteers. In a report entitled Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable?, published by the Heartland Institute, Watts concludes that "the errors in the record exceed by a wide margin the purported rise in temperature during the twentieth century."

Prompted by his work, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration issued a preliminary report that charted data from 70 stations that SurfaceStations.org identified as 'good' or 'best' against the rest of the dataset surveyed at that time, and concluded, "there is no indication from this analysis that poor station exposure has imparted a bias in the U.S. temperature trends." Watts issued a rebuttal in which he asserted that the preliminary analysis excluded new data on quality of surface stations, and criticized the use of homogenized data from the stations, which in his view accounts for the creation of two nearly identical graphs.

The Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres subsequently accepted for publication a study, citing Watts' Surfacestations.org, which concludes that "In summary, we find no evidence that the CONUS average temperature trends are inflated due to poor station siting." In fact, the analysis of unadjusted data from poorly sited stations did reveal a bias, however, it was not the expected bias. The poorly sited stations measured maximum temperatures on average lower than the well sited stations. The authors note:

"Results indicate that there is a mean bias associated with poor exposure sites relative to good exposure sites; however, this bias is consistent with previously documented changes associated with the widespread conversion to electronic sensors in the USHCN during the last 25 years. Moreover, the sign of the bias is counterintuitive to photographic documentation of poor exposure because associated instrument changes have led to an artificial negative (“cool”) bias in maximum temperatures and only a slight positive (“warm”) bias in minimum temperatures."

See also

References

  1. http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=7FAD9B84-237D-9F22-E8293FE98289E87F
  2. Blake, Heidi (2010-02-15). "UN global warming data skewed by heat from planes and buildings". The Daily Telegraph. London.
  3. "List of AMS Television Seal Holders". American Meteorological Society. Retrieved 2010-05-13.
  4. Pearce, Fred, The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming, (2010) Guardian Books, ISBN 978-0-85265-229-9. Pearce calls him a "radio meteorologist."
  5. Watts Up With That? blog
  6. Watts, Anthony (2009). "Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable?" (PDF). Heartland Institute. Retrieved 2009-11-24.
  7. Watts, Anthony. "About Watts Up With That?". Watts Up With That?. Retrieved 2009-02-09.
  8. Indar, Josh (2006-03-16). "One out, one in, one on". Sacramento News & Review. Retrieved 2009-10-13.
  9. Rasini, Marin, "Find out more on climate", Townsville Bulletin, June 12, 2010, p. 39.
  10. Watts, Anthony (March 27, 2008). "Gore to throw insults on 60 minutes". Watts Up With That?. Retrieved 2009-02-06.
  11. ^ Pearce, Fred, The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming, (2010) Guardian Books, ISBN 978-0-85265-229-9, p. XVI.
  12. "2008 Weblog Awards". Weblogawards.org. 2008.
  13. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/11/dueling-sites-t/
  14. Beck, Glenn. Inconvenient Thermometers, glennbeck.com. Premiere Radio Networks, March 3, 2008.
  15. ^ Watts, Anthony. "About SurfaceStations.org". SurfaceStations.org. Retrieved 2009-03-06.
  16. Climate Reference Network (CRN) — Site Handbook (PDF). CRN Series. NOAA/NESDIS. 2002. NOAA-CRN/OSD-2002-0002R0UD0. Retrieved 2009-09-30. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. Watts, Anthony (2009). Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable? (PDF). Chicago, IL: The Heartland Institute. ISBN 1-934791-26-6. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  18. "Talking Points related to concerns about whether the U.S. temperature record is reliable" (PDF). NOAA Climate Services. July 6, 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-02.
  19. Watts, Anthony (2009-06-29). "NCDC writes ghost "talking points" rebuttal to surfacestations project". Watts Up With That?. Retrieved 2009-07-09.
  20. Watts, Anthony (July 31, 2009). "On Climate, Comedy, Copyrights, and Cinematography". Watts Up With That?. Retrieved 2009-07-31.
  21. ^ Menne, Matthew J. (2010). "On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record" (PDF). J. Geophys. Res. 115: D11108. doi:10.1029/2009JD013094. In summary, we find no evidence that the CONUS average temperature trends are inflated due to poor station siting...The reason why station exposure does not play an obvious role in temperature trends probably warrants further investigation. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  22. Cook, John (27 January 2010). "Climate sceptics distract us from the scientific realities of global warming". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 5 February 2010.

External links

Template:Persondata

Categories: