Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ohio State Route 369/GA1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Ohio State Route 369

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Racepacket (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 13 March 2011 (→GA Review: fix format). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:43, 13 March 2011 by Racepacket (talk | contribs) (→GA Review: fix format)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

No disamb. or invalid external links. One must seriously question why you are nominating two short spur road for GA consideration, when the main OH 4 road, that this route connects, does not even have a route description. Wouldn't it make more sense to work on the major roads first, and leave the short (less than 2 miles) roads until the after the major roads are completed?

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Reword:"where the intersecting freeway meets Lower Valley Pike." I assume that OH 4 was routed on Lower Valley Pike before it became a freeway. Also, you can incorporate the idea that OH 369 share a bridge with Lower Valley Pike under OH 4, and that Lower Valley Pike continues east undesignated after the interchange with OH.
    "highway are now lined with homes"- delete "now" - it is temporal.
    consider expanding Parclo to Partial cloverleaf interchange. Consider wikilink it.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    The Traffic report (Ref # 5) is a bit confusing. I read it as saying only 1,580 non-commerical vehicles and 120 commercial vehicles use this road to access US 40. The other data includes traffic that leaves the interchange to access Lower Valley Pike.
    Shouldn't Ref #5 point to page 5 instead of page 6?
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Any construction planned?
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    No edit wars.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Did you check flickr or other sources?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)