This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Viridiscalculus (talk | contribs) at 16:12, 16 March 2011 (→History of Maryland Route 200). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:12, 16 March 2011 by Viridiscalculus (talk | contribs) (→History of Maryland Route 200)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)History of Maryland Route 200
- History of Maryland Route 200 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the Maryland Route 200 article. Dough4872 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge We don't need a separate history article for a state highway article. No other highway article in the U.S. has this. --Rschen7754 01:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Also see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Opposition to Maryland Route 200. --Rschen7754 01:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Summarize, merge and redirect for the same reasons I gave at the previous AfD. Imzadi 1979 → 02:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge The MD 200 article is not so large that the content of this article needs to be split out of it. VC 16:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)