This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PBS (talk | contribs) at 19:03, 29 March 2011 (→March 2011). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:03, 29 March 2011 by PBS (talk | contribs) (→March 2011)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Proposed changes
I have recently upgraded the {{1911}} and {{Catholic}} templates. I would like to do the same to this one and {{DNB}} but instead of having {{DNB}} as a wrapper around {{cite encyclopedia}} I would like to have it as a wrapper around this template. To do that I would like to:
- separate out title and wstitle so that title can be used for articles not yet on wikisource.
- Get rid of the no named parameter argument -- So that editors make a concious choice between wikisource (wstitle) and not yet on wikisource (title). This will also mean getting rid of the second unnamed parameter which is a comment field. I think we should junk the comment field completely as it can just as easily be added on the same line directly after the template if it is needed.
To make these changes. I propose to
- Change the documentation of the template.
- Run AWB over the <1.5k links to this template
- Alter the template, which will include a change to the icon if title instead of wstitle is used. Add a few more variable options which might be need by {{DNB}}. Add a hidden categories one citing DNB but no link to a wikisource article.
Comments welcome. -- PBS (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Changes made -- PBS (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Proposed move
I propose to move this template from {{DNB Cite}} to "{{cite DNB}} as it fits in better with names like {{cite web}} {{cite encyclopedia}} etc. -- PBS (talk) 12:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Move made -- PBS (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
March 2011
Bob I think this edit this edit is a retrograde step, do you know of any usage of the template where this is a problem, because I think I went through all of of them from unamed parameter to named parameter when when I put this template in. -- PBS (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)