Misplaced Pages

Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)/GA1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Racepacket (talk | contribs) at 05:30, 10 April 2011 (GA Review: Passed GA). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:30, 10 April 2011 by Racepacket (talk | contribs) (GA Review: Passed GA)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A (prose):
    Lead: Please change Ottawa to Ottawa County.
    At first I asked myself whether "city limits" was proper terminology, but I have verified that Delphos is a full city despite its population and size.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Although not a GA requirement, you might want to change ] to ] so that it will appear in the category in the same sort order as the other highways.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    I have not seen any problems so far.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Any future construction plans? Any American Recovery Act projects? I assume not.
    Would it be worth saying that K-41 is a two-lane highway its entire length?
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    No edit wars.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Although not a GA requirement, photographs of the highway are always nice to include.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
    I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) — PCB 05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)