Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Rachel Marsden (2nd nomination) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Isotelus (talk | contribs) at 13:05, 7 March 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:05, 7 March 2006 by Isotelus (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Marsden2

The "Speedy Keep" decision was a blatant attamept to prevent discussion. This article is libelous and leaves Misplaced Pages open to a lawsuit. It is am attempt to smear the subject. It is filled with POV, slected facts. Please read "talk" page before voting to see the objections raised. Several Canadian Misplaced Pages editors refuse to do anything to restrain the stalking of the subject of this article by the authors Isotelus 12:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete

One of the worst articles on Misplaced Pages. Point of view is so blatant and negative that it's beyond fixing and a whole new article is needed. Delete Mark Bourrie 12:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)