This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TreasuryTag (talk | contribs) at 14:49, 9 May 2011 (Reverted edits by SarekOfVulcan (talk) to last version by Walter Görlitz). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:49, 9 May 2011 by TreasuryTag (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by SarekOfVulcan (talk) to last version by Walter Görlitz)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Misplaced Pages, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
Just to fix the formatting...
You could have just asked me you know =p
I am wondering why I see fifty different people marked "Treasury Tag" with various titles in different colours after them, yet they all link here afaik. Surely you have been asked about this before (sorry my message didn't make that clear). Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 09:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- They're (obviously) not fifty different people, hence having identical usernames, userpages and signatures. They're all me, and my signature subtly and randomly changes each time I post him. ╟─TreasuryTag►constabulary─╢ 09:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well I got that much (unless there was some weird group of people that for some reason, no other user commented on), and the randomised thing was a hypothesis I had. So I guess that hypothesis was correct. =p Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 15:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
wikifying...
I'm sorry but which of the grand total of 17 words were you thinking needed bluelinking with this tag? You've done this elsewhere. Would some form of "expand" tag be more useful? Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well firstly (as I'm sure you know, given your extensive following of my edits), that's a tag which AWB automatically applies, and since it doesn't show the entire article in its diff-window, to an extent I have to take its recommendation on trust. But anyway, I see words like 'Europe', say, that could easily be linked there. ╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 08:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- scintillating - no I've never used nor come across that program. I think Europe is possibly a bit obvious to link, but meh. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- And presumably the clear link to WP:AWB in the edit-summary prompted you to read that (previously unknown?) page thoroughly before coming to my talkpage and objecting to me making bad edits? ╟─TreasuryTag►stannary parliament─╢ 10:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why would that exonerate you from slapping inappropriate wikify tags on pages? Some others were too, which is why I scanned some of the wikify tags that you were placing on articles. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you're so clueless as to have never heard of AWB, and so bizarre as to think that linking the word 'Europe' to Europe is a bad idea, then you'll excuse me for not valuing your feedback and asking you to keep it to yourself in future. Please do not edit my talkpage again unless leaving me a notification required by policy. Please do not feel obliged to follow me around Misplaced Pages tracking my edits and commenting in the same places I comment. OK? ╟─TreasuryTag►District Collector─╢ 10:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why would that exonerate you from slapping inappropriate wikify tags on pages? Some others were too, which is why I scanned some of the wikify tags that you were placing on articles. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- And presumably the clear link to WP:AWB in the edit-summary prompted you to read that (previously unknown?) page thoroughly before coming to my talkpage and objecting to me making bad edits? ╟─TreasuryTag►stannary parliament─╢ 10:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- scintillating - no I've never used nor come across that program. I think Europe is possibly a bit obvious to link, but meh. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Plautdietsch language
Please stop "fixing" the Plautdietsch language article. You are changing the diphthong "ie" and turning into abbreviation of the Latin phrase id est: i.e.. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2011 (UTC)