This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mbz1 (talk | contribs) at 14:32, 10 May 2011 (→Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:32, 10 May 2011 by Mbz1 (talk | contribs) (→Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| |
| archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 |
If I left a post on your talk page...
Please answer there. I'll see it, no worries.
Are you here because I deleted your article?
Please read through this first to find out why.
NS Antarctica Expedition
On 10:34, 20 May 2010 you stated in an edit, in references, "Ritscher's expedition report, more information pending" - is their any more information please?
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.16.5, 1.17b1; 1.18 branched; UploadWizard the default; Berlin Hackathon; brief news
Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs
Hi Gwen, Here I explained to user:SarekOfVulcan why I opposed his RFA. In order to do this I had to bring up your conduct, when you unfairly blocked me after being canvased. BTW it has been more than a month since you have lifted my unheard of, unfair and humiliating bans that I was forced to accept, and I have not made a single contributions to any of those boards, except my own AE case.Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)