Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jack Merridew

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Barong (talk | contribs) at 09:06, 11 May 2011 (→unblock: ,). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:06, 11 May 2011 by Barong (talk | contribs) (→unblock: ,)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

If I've misunderstood what was expected, people should feel free to reverse my block.—Kww(talk) 02:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

The account has been globally locked by a steward. Risker (talk) 02:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm sory Risker, I can'r be doing with all this; you are just going to have to go and find him, I need him to sort out my IT problems. No imediate hurry, first thing tomorrow morning will be fine. One despairs, one really does. Giacomo Returned 21:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Jack, whaa? /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Wow, this really sucks. :( Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Help

Need help with my User Page. I see you're blocked. Contact me off wiki if you get this Minor4th 01:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Jack Merridew unban

  • +missing notification ;)

Barong 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

trolling

trolling: 1 2 3 4


Byte me, grawp/b-tards. Barong 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jack Merridew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now sul:locked, thus the blocks here, and on commons, are not necessary.

What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.

Decline reason:

You're not the blocked user and as such unblock requests will be ignored. Sorry.  狐 Déan rolla bairille!  09:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Barong 08:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)