Misplaced Pages

User:Newyorkbrad/Bradspeak

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Newyorkbrad

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Slakr (talk | contribs) at 01:18, 26 May 2011 (+reflist so that __TOC__ isn't needed. :P). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:18, 26 May 2011 by Slakr (talk | contribs) (+reflist so that __TOC__ isn't needed. :P)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
This page in a nutshell:

One has to deliberate and evaluate fully and then come to a considered opinion before giving one's opinions in a forum where one's opinions could be subject of debate and conjecture which could reflect upon oneself and lead others to form an opinion as to one's opinion.

This nutshell is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by embiggening it.

Bradspeak, a term coined on the talkpage of User:Iridescent in 2011, is the formal, deliberate, and exhaustive style in which Misplaced Pages functionaries communicate in public in order to cover their backs and forestall any possible criticism, or any use of their opinion to further a wikicrusade, or for any other inappropriate purpose. Bradspeak is named, somewhat unfairly, after long-time arbitrator User:Newyorkbrad.

Scope-limiting

Bradspeak seeks, in part, to limit the applicable scope of a particular comment or decision thereby reducing its ability to be used outside of the most immediate subject of discussion. It therefore tends to be extremely context-specific whenever possible. As a result, generalizations tend to be avoided whenever possible so that any particular generalization—and therefore any particular philosophy—can neither be vindicated or discounted based on a single decision intended to only be applied to a single instance.

Diff-friendly

In order to reduce out-of-context diff use in on-wiki arguments, Bradspeak tends to be highly proofread so as to avoid subsequent revisions needed to clarify otherwise-ambiguous portions of the first edit. Making the assumption that some editors might happily drop would-be intermediate revisions, Bradspeak seeks to perform one large revision to prevent the need for further revisions that would naturally in and of themselves be taken out of context.

See also

References

This very very short essay is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by comprehensively and carefully increasing its size to an adequate dimension.

Categories: