This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eraserhead1 (talk | contribs) at 22:41, 22 June 2011 (←Created page with '{{medcabstatus |article={{SUBPAGENAME}} |status=New |date=~~~~~ |requester=~~~ |parties=Eraserhead1, Anthony Appleyard, Roscelese, HuskyHuskie, NYyankees51, Andrew ...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:41, 22 June 2011 by Eraserhead1 (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{medcabstatus |article={{SUBPAGENAME}} |status=New |date=~~~~~ |requester=~~~ |parties=Eraserhead1, Anthony Appleyard, Roscelese, HuskyHuskie, NYyankees51, Andrew ...')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Abortion-rights movement |
| Status | New |
| Request date | 22:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) |
| Requesting party | -- Eraserhead1 <talk> |
| Parties involved | Eraserhead1, Anthony Appleyard, Roscelese, HuskyHuskie, NYyankees51, Andrew c among others. |
Request details
Where is the dispute?
Talk:Abortion-rights_movement#Move.3F, but previous discussion has occurred on the other article talk pages.
Who is involved?
The list of the users involved. For example:
- User:Eraserhead1
- User:Anthony Appleyard
- User:Roscelese
- User:HuskyHuskie
- User:NYyankees51
- User:Andrew c
Acceptance of Mediation
Please place your signature here to indicate that you are aware of this mediation process and want to participate in it:
- ~~~~
What is the dispute?
The issue is that the Abortion articles have become confused, we can't decide what the best title for the pro-life and pro-choice articles are, and whether they should actually be merged into Abortion Debate. Move requests have been made but have failed to be closed promptly and haven't been conducted particularly well.
What would you like to change about this?
I would like the discussion to come to a sensible conclusion so we can decide how to structure the content in a way that everyone is happy with.
How do you think we can help?
Help us work out what the best way of structuring the content is, possibly with some less conventional methods of figuring out the best solution (e.g. straw polling). Some outside eyes would be useful here.