This is an old revision of this page, as edited by William Mauco (talk | contribs) at 05:22, 21 March 2006 (→Position of the Moldovan side). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:22, 21 March 2006 by William Mauco (talk | contribs) (→Position of the Moldovan side)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Politics of Transnistria |
---|
Constitution |
Executive |
LegislatureSupreme Council
Speaker Alexander Korshunov Political parties |
Elections
|
Administrative divisions
|
Foreign relations
Diplomatic missions of / in Transnistria |
The disputed status of Transnistria arose because of the Transnistrian declaration of independence on Sep. 2, 1990, which is not recognized by Moldova.
Moldova lost control of Transnistria in the 1990 breakup of the Moldavian SSR and the subsequent War of Transnistria, but never formally ceded the territory. Moreover, Transnistria has not been internationally recognised (except by other unrecognised states) and is generally considered to be a part Moldova.
Transnistria's two main political groups, Republic (Respublica) and Renewal (Obnovleniye) oppose any transfer of sovereignty to Moldova, and no major political party or pressure group in Transnistria supports union with Moldova. However, negotiations under OSCE auspices have been ongoing since 1997 based on the premise that better relations are desirable, and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.
Position of the Transnistrian side
The territory to the East of the Dniester River never belonged neither to Romania, nor to its predecessors, such as the Principality of Moldavia. This territory was split off from Ukrainian SSR in a political maneuver of the USSR to become a seed of the Moldavian SSR. (A similar example of a Soviet expansionist maneuver was the Finnish Democratic Republic). Transnistria ceded itself from Moldavian SSR before the Dissolution of the Soviet Union. Since Moldova declared independence of the Soviet Union, all political arrangements made within the Soviet Union must be considered void.
Position of the Moldovan side
The Republic of Moldova considers itself the rightful succesor state to the Moldavian SSR. It considers the current Transnistrian government to be illegitimate and not the rightful representative of the region's populace. It insists that Transnistria cannot exist as an independent political entity but must be reintegrated into Moldova.
External links
Transnistrian side
Moldovan side
- EuroJournal.org's Transnistria category
- Trilateral Plan for Solving the Transnsitrian Issue (developed by Moldova-Ukraine-Romania expert group)
Others
International organizations
- OSCE Mission to Moldova: Conflict resolution and negotiation category
- Marius Vahl and Michael Emerson, "Moldova and the Transnistrian Conflict" (pdf) in "Europeanization and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Periphery", JEMIE - Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 1/2004, Ghent, Belgium
Ukrainian side
Russian side
Romanian side
This article related to the Republic of Moldova is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |