Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dinner for three

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dinner for three (talk | contribs) at 18:12, 4 September 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:12, 4 September 2011 by Dinner for three (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

September 2011

Please stop your string of reverts, before this issue escalates into an edit war. Given that you are making so many edits in such a short period of time it makes sense to discuss the issues, so as to not make the changes look like vandalism from a newly registered account. On what basis have your 50 or so edits to places in Greece been made? Lunch for Two (talk) 11:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

I really get enough to revert your vandalism today, falsification of sources, etc. If you check the names in both Bulgarian and Macedonian Misplaced Pages in the villages you revert you will see that they are the same. What I did in Greece was updating where Bulgarian names already existed and never adding mew ones.

I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic *is* Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try WP:dispute resolution. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than WP:edit warring. — kwami (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh my mother, reverted to last version by Lunch for Two?? OK I will free to restore them but why I have to waste my time for this nonsense? Better take your attention at such you revert, and such . All these covered POV-pushing by Lunch for Two should be reverted immideately and the reverts in such case are inescapable. To take Latin transliterations in every village where Cyrilic exists is not so easy and fast and they should get back in the page too. The only I want from you is to revert priror to Lunch for two edits, because most of them are covered POV disruption, source falsifications, etc.Dinner for three (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)