Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tomstoner

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tomstoner (talk | contribs) at 14:15, 25 March 2006 (Faridabad). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:15, 25 March 2006 by Tomstoner (talk | contribs) (Faridabad)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome

Hello, Tomstoner, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Misplaced Pages Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Deepak|वार्ता 02:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Deepak. I wish the even-handedness and dedication to NPOV of the editors on the Indian Cities Project page, where I believe we met, was shared univerally! --Tomstoner 17:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

Be careful throwing the word Vandalism around as you did here; we have a pretty specific definition of it that I don't think applied in this case. (ESkog) 16:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

More precisely I would "borders on vandalism" -- a description I have seen used by others before in describing similar skewing of the page. The discussion page gives a fuller explanation of the reason for the revert. --Tomstoner 17:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

ESkog is giving you good advice; you would be well-advised to pay attention. "Vandalism" has a particular meaning on Misplaced Pages and if you accuse others of it when it does not apply the consequences may be serious. I in fact had just been looking at exactly that edit and wondering whether you should be reported for using a bogus edit summary: removing content that you did not agree with and masking it by saying you were "removing vandalism". I'd advise you to read Misplaced Pages:Vandalism and let that be your guide as to when something is "vandalism". -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Jeez Louise, I said the comment was incorrect. This was a proper edit and I explained it in the Naked Shortselling Talk page. Note my response and further comments.--Tomstoner 14:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

WP:PAIN

I've looked over the contributions by User:Mfv and found some very mild incivility, but no personal attacks.
brenneman 00:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, well his last comments were toned down, so hopefully we can proceed civilly here. --Tomstoner 16:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

NSS - grandfathering

Hi,

I'm replying to your post on my talk page about the naked short selling article. I admit I have a limited knowledge of securities trading, so my perspective represents that of a casual reader.

I am assuming that the grandfathering text you mentioned is the two-section excerpt from http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/keyregshoissues.htm. This is definitely original research. It is, however, a valid perspective which deserves a link within the NSS article. I hope that answers your question.

As for the rest of the article, I think it has significantly improved since I last looked at it. There is, however, one excessively large quote (section Does Naked Shorting Drive Stock Prices Down?, "There are many...13 consecutive settlement days.") that should be condensed into a link. That would make the article much easier to read.

Good luck,  Cdcon  19:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


Faridabad

faridabad is not particualrly a tourist town though Suraj kund and Bhadkal lake are nice places to go to for enjoying the local scenery (unsigned)

Thanks much for your comment. By the way I moved your comment from my main user page. I have relatives in Faridabad so I know the town quite well. Incidentally there was an interesting map in the article that I asked about. --Tomstoner 14:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

No Worries. I lived in Faridabad for 12 years of my life and saw the city expand gradually. if you need info give me a buzz. Manish Sharma 25 March 2006.

Really? Well perhaps you know something about map. I will drop you a line on your user page. Thanks. --Tomstoner 14:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)