Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) at 07:33, 13 October 2011 (→Something to look at: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Magazines Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Something to look at

Louise Blouin Media have responded to the negative story in the New York Observer. I'd like to note as well that the quote we have from the Observer story reads more like an editorial opinion column than an objective news story. The series of lawsuits they describe, if true, don't seem to imply anything about "keeping the lights on" either literally nor metaphorically.

Due to a potential conflict of interest (the Observer article discusses a dinner at which I was in attendance), I won't be getting directly involved. I merely post here to bring the issue to wider attention.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• Unassessed magazine articles
• Unknown-importance magazine articles
• WikiProject Magazines articles