Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 17:23, 22 October 2011 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:Moogwrench/Archive 1.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Volume 21Issue 115 January 2025 Giuseppe Savo – cc-by-sa-4.0From the editorsLooking back, looking forwardThe 20th anniversary of The Signpost. David Revoy – CC BY-SA 4.0Traffic reportThe most viewed articles of 2024A lot of psephology! Mike Peel – CC-BY SA 4.0In the mediaWill you be targeted?HUMINT or humbug? Mr.Zhé – CC BY-SA 4.0Technology reportNew Calculator template brings interactivity at lastHallelujah! Johnny Au – CC BY-SA 4.0EssayMeet the Canadian who holds the longest editing streak on Misplaced PagesJohnny Au has edited for 17 years straight without missing a day. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – PDOpinionReflections one score henceSome thoughts from the original editor-in-chief. Kawamura Kiyoo – PDNews and notesIt's a new dawn, it's a new day, it's a new life for me... and I'm feeling freePublic Domain Day 2025, Women in Red hits 20% biography milestone, Spanish Misplaced Pages reaches two million articles, and other news from the Wikimedia world. Blackcat – CC BY-SA 3.0SerendipityWhat we've left behind, and where we want to go nextThe Signpost staff on achievements of '24 and hopes for '25. Ministério das Comunicações – CC 2.0Op-edElon Musk and the right on Misplaced PagesThe latest crusade? Miss Kamola – cc-zeroIn focusTwenty years of The Signpost: What did it take?Our alumni speak! Mister rf – cc-by-sa-4.0Arbitration reportAnalyzing commonalities of some contentious topicsApplying the scientific method to a model of conflict that leads to arbitration. HridoyKundu – CC BY-SA 4.0HumourHow to make friends on Misplaced PagesThis post fact-checked by real Wikipedian patriots. Single-page edition ← Previous issue The Signpost: doing it for free since 2005. Home About Archives Newsroom Subscribe Suggestions

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Big Brother 2011 accusation

I edited material I had contributed myself to update it, not vandalise so it would be appreciated that you do not accuse me of vandalsim, perhaps after contact with others trying to remove material they wish to delete. It was not vandalism, it was an update to that I had written myself. A contributor from UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.153.183 (talk) 07:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Please see my comment on your page. Moogwrench (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Reversal of deletions: Solid Edge

Hello ! I see you've reverted my deletions on this article. Yet I see them as necessary as they are essentially advertisement and unverified claims, like "claimed to speed up process up to 100 times". Most so-called "references" are from the software company itself, which gives it no real substance. Also, many so-called "reviews" in the CAD industry are very superficial. See for instance http://www.deelip.com/?p=3758 Using them as references is ludicrous at best. I didn't deface the substance of the article but removed the parts that made it an ad. It's sad to see that Misplaced Pages serves as a commercial place for marketing managers. We have to fight this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.236.2.163 (talk) 08:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying but it would be wise if you talk about exactly what you feel makes those contributions spam/advertisement. Also, realize that External links have a different policy as well than just straight out references within the article (I am refering to some of your previous edits). Also, remember to use descriptive edit summaries that explain what you are doing, otherwise it just looks like you are randomly blanking sections if you don't put anything in your summary, like with this edit. Moogwrench (talk) 08:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I failed to describe more clearly my edits. I thought they were quite obvious. The references I've removed are either self serving references to websites/videos made by the company itself, i.e pure marketing, or by so-called third party reviews that are untrustable (this can be questioned, I agree), or obsolete links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.236.2.163 (talk) 08:51, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Some coal balls falafel for you!

Thanks! →Στc. 05:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

hi there, I am Vincent and I hail from South Africa. I thought of it a nice idea to establish intelectual conversations with people across the world, I hope me and you could share knowledge about everyday events. By the way I'm a 19 year old, Black Male student. As i function (talk) 11:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

DYK for American School Hygiene Association

On 3 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article American School Hygiene Association, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1907, President Theodore Roosevelt became honorary president of the American School Hygiene Association, a Progressive Era organization dedicated to school children's health? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/American School Hygiene Association.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging

When you're looking at new pages, it's generally recommended that you not tag articles for A7 deletion so quickly. You tagged Game of Nerds only 3 minutes after it was created. Now, I did go ahead and delete the page, as it was clear to me (after a little online research) that no amount of work would make the article pass A7, but it's better to give new articles a few hours in case the article creator is still in the middle of the creation process and is intending to add more info that would be a credible claim of significance or importance. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying, especially from a WP:BITE perspective, but at the same time, I think a few hours is too long to wait to tag something, perhaps an hour would okay... if the case is indeterminate. Each page has to be evaluated on a case by case basis, if something looks like it has potential, sure... why not give it time, eh? But if we are talking about some dinky free online flash game, why are we going to waste a lot of time dealing with something like that? It was readily apparent that it wasn't going to pass A7 from the get go. Moogwrench (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

What if the "dinky free online flash game" won some sort of award for "Best new online game of 2010?" What if it became so popular that it were talked about in regular newspapers or tech journals? I agreed that in that case, that article wasn't going to pass, but that was only after I went searching around online for other sources. I guess to me, it's that there's really no harm in keeping things up for an hour or two. However, there is a counter argument based on "trying to catch the editor while they're still here"; I've raised a discussion about this (not this specific deletion, but about whether we should codify more specific "rules" about timing) at WT:NPP. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

re: your message

Hi Moogwrench, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 02:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:NOTNOW?

Hi,
please have a look at Misplaced Pages:When not to link to WP:NOTNOW -- the WP:NOTNOW essay is intended for very new editors starting an RfA, not for an editor with 4000+ edits over 2.5 years like Ankitbhatt.
Cheers, Amalthea 08:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)