This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Materialscientist (talk | contribs) at 07:50, 23 October 2011 (→User-reported: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:50, 23 October 2011 by Materialscientist (talk | contribs) (→User-reported: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles and content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 19:32 on 25 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Alerts
Bot-reported
User-reported
- Electronicmusicprofessor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Creates articles and inserts links about the same non-notable artists and blogs.. Ridernyc (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- 72.79.199.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism-only, continued after final warning. Same editing pattern and geographic location as other IPs, some blocked previously: 71.127.10.102 (talk · contribs · block log) | 72.70.250.163 (talk · contribs · block log) | 72.70.228.51 (talk · contribs · block log) | 71.127.2.243 (talk · contribs · block log) | 72.70.242.165 (talk · contribs · block log) – Wdchk (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ajoykt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This is my 4th report since 21 October 2011. Group of users (before it was users D.H and 83.89.0.118, now it is also User Ajoykt, Revision 20:46, 21 October 2011) persistently continues to delete my contributions on the OPERA neutrino anomaly page, namely the block: Other researchers pointed out that the Cohen-Glashow arguments are valid only if the Lorentz symmetry is broken by the presence of a preferred frame but they become invalid if instead the symmetry is deformed. The group claims that the reference I provide cites the primary source. But the primary source here is the original OPERA announcement whereas the reference to arXiv:1110.0521 is a secondary source because it is a research paper which analyses some prior results and works. Besides, the group destroys my contribution in such a way that it could be undone only manually and also it creates difficulties in analyzing their actions. Please, protect my contribution. User1344 (talk) 06:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Discuss your changes at the talk pages and avoid edit warring. Arxiv is not peer reviewed and generally is not a reliable source. Thus your position is weak. Try to find better references. Materialscientist (talk) 07:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- 76.99.200.128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - User mass deleting "Demographics" from multiple city-related articles after final warning, which to my understanding falls under vandalism per "Blanking, illegitimate". - SudoGhost 07:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, L. Smolin, OPERA neutrinos and relativity, arXiv:1110.0521.