This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.122.74.210 (talk) at 20:23, 27 March 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:23, 27 March 2006 by 213.122.74.210 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please do not vandalise the school's wiki entry with erroneous information. According to the British place name gazeteer Shaw and High Crompton are located in the county of Lancashire. The other control authorities associated with Shaw and High Crompton are Unitary Authority area i.e. council (Oldham), Police Area (Greater Manchester), Health Authority (West Pennine), and Lieutenancy area i.e Magistrates/judicial juristiction (Greater Manchester).
Crompton House's Location
Please can members kindly make themselves aware about some geographical factors concerning Crompton House. Whilst educational, this is intended to inform members with the greatest of respect.
Since the 1974 local government reforms, Shaw and Crompton lies within the metropolitan borough of Oldham (NOTE - Oldham is a seperate town, which also lies within the borough).
There is some confusion about this as the borough is also named after the town (unlike the metropolitan borough of Tameside where the principal town of Ashton lies).
With regard to suggestions that a borough is an authority - this is wrong. Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council is of course an authority, whereas the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham is an undisputable and very much working definable geographical area.
Crompton House's LEA (local educational Authority), like that of all schools in Shaw and Crompton, is Oldham LEA. Crompton House is listed in the Oldham Chronicle as Oldham's best school. It has and Oldham area (OL2) postcode. It's member of parliament is Oldham East and Saddleworth MP Phil Woolas. Within this understanding, Crompton House is not in Oldham (as in the town), nor Lancashire (a county that lies some many miles away), but within the metropolitan borough of Oldham boundary, in Greater Manchester.
Note there is no affilation with Lancashire.
With regards to Lancashire vs Greater Manchester, Shaw and Crompton is served by GMPTE (Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive), Greater Manchester police, and if one obtains an Oldham or Greater Manchester A to Z, one would find Shaw and Crompton and Crompton House in it.
Lancashire is in modern times, concerned with Lancastrian towns such as Preston, Lancaster, Blackpool etc.
These factors present themselves as factual, and whilst the vast majority of Misplaced Pages editors adhere to this, please can those who wish to have geographical boundaries changed or reverted to pre-1974 times, please do so via parliamentary means and not discredit the content and purpose of Misplaced Pages.
If you wish to dispute/respond/agree with my comments please feel free on this page. Many thanks Jhamez84 01:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
The above information is erroneous
Oldham metropolitan Borough and Greater Manchester are not places - they are authorities. OMB is a unitary authority and Shaw and Crompton falls under the juristiction of OMB. However, as the British Place names gazeteer makes very clear towns are located in counties. The location of Shaw and cromption is in the county of Lancashire. If the geographic information continues to be vandalised please correct it. The geographic information can be verified here:
http://www.abcounties.co.uk/newgaz/index.htm
Jhamez84 01:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC) says... This is clearly a dispute which requires a third party or a democratic process. I will request it via the proper channels.
During this time, please can any annoymous editors join wikipedia via normal means, and go through the Sandbox and wikipedia tutorials before making any edits which may not have neutral point of view.
However, I see that the individual concerned does not have a member name, nor are they adding their content via the correct Misplaced Pages formatting processes. I would further add at this point, that there is no Misplaced Pages page on a so called British place name gazeteer.... which appears to be a poorly constructed website with an agenda of reverting back to historic/traditional counties.
Within that logic, I would argue that England remains part of the Roman Empire, just because I have an agenda of promoting it, and/or it once was part of it.
I request third party mediation at this point. Thank you.
National Archives
I suggest the plaintiff should visit his town hall and request guidelines on what constitutes a formal geographic address. Formal addresses are not supposed to reference unitary or control authorities because they often change. Prior to the introduction of postcodes it was common to include the mail town as part of the address for practical purposes. I suggest editors (registered or otherwise) desist from entering factual errors into the Wiki database. Since the plaintiff refuses to accept a gazeteer as proof that Shaw is located in Lancashire, I will instead refer interested parties to the National Archives, a government maintained site:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/nra/searches/sidocs.asp?LR=758
While there are no records specifically on Crompton House, there are numerous records on other organizations in Shaw and Crompton. The location in both these cases is given as either "Shaw, Lancashire" or "Crompton, Lancashire". Mentions of Oldham Metropolitan Borough are omitted.
Jhamez84 02:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC) says.... with regard to this, please can members also visit the following for consideration:
- http://www.manchester2002-uk.com/towns/oldham1.html
- http://www.gmpte.com/
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Greater_Manchester
- http://www.gmp.police.uk/mainsite/pages/divisionssearch.htm (government maintained website)
- http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/GBH_match_page.jsp?ons=Oldham
- http://www.oldham.gov.uk/maps-oldham-area.gif (government maintained website)
- http://www.agma.gov.uk/ccm/portal/;jsessionid=AFE76E2838716C62AE24B6E5BEB52B23 (government maintained website)
- http://www.manchesterfire.gov.uk/?id7=1&id8=2 (government maintained website)
- http://www.shawcam.co.uk/
- http://www.answers.com/topic/shaw-greater-manchester
- http://www.wheresmyproperty.com/towns/GreaterManchester/shaw.htm
- http://www.daisycommunications.co.uk/product/24848_broadband_Products%20and%20Services_Daisy%20Broadband_Broadband%20Availability_Greater%20Manchester.htm
- http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/home/index.asp (goverment maintained website)
I argue that with a progressive understanding of geography, and the evolutionary nature of conurbations, Shaw and Crompton lie within Greater Manchester and the met. borough of Oldham as do the above unbiased websites. I hope this aids this process.
Further to this, when I receive a copy of the Lancashire Evening Chronicle or the Lancashire Evening News through my door, and am greeted by my Lancashire police constable, and vote for a Lancashire member of parliament, and pay tax to the Lancashire county council, and use Lancashire county public transport, and have any connection with the people from the likes of Fleetwood, Ribble and Clitheroe as opposed to Oldham, Tameside and Rochdale, I will then of course admit that I live in Shaw and Crompton, Lancashire. Thank you
Wiki global consistency
I would like to point out that most of the aforementioned sites are not offical government ones (the plaintiff refused to accept the gazeteer site as proof). Secondly, the government sites which are mentioned are not specifically designed to show geographic information. They cover services which are provided within the various authorities (since Lancashire breaks down into many authorities this is natural). I would like to point out that the dispute is about the geographic location of the school, not which authority it falls under. Giving unitary authorites as geographic locations is confusing (especially for people who live far away from the area and particularly global users who may have no idea where these places are).
In keeping location information consistent with other countries (and historic locations from the same area) I request that locations are put in a purely geographic context, and since most countries use the county system I think that should be the system used here. If the OMB boundaries are redrawn this will mean changes to all affected location information. The geographic county system is more widely known, more accessible to people not familiar with the area, and more robust to future changes which the government is forever undertaking.
If you take encyclopeadias as a guide for wiki, I can assure you that you would never find a unitary authority given as a geographic location. Most likely it would give the county or a compass bearing (i.e. North-West England) or sometimes a district such as 'Greater Manchester' if the district is globally recognized.
Minor edit war
I have now edited this article in line with the official naming conventions
Please keep all further discussion on location conventions on the Talk:Shaw and Crompton page from now on to keep the thread easy to follow. Aquilina 11:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
And Also... (24th March 2006)
Furthermore, there is an unregistered user constantly removing or reverting mentions of Oldham in the main article. That Crompton House is in Shaw and Crompton in the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham is firstly resolved and undisputable. The reverter in question has been warned, and also blocked on several occations, but is now using multiple (non-static dynamic IP rolling) IP addresses. This is prohibitted on Misplaced Pages, and I urge all members to be mindful of the editor in question, watch their edits, and tag them appropriately as a sock puppet. Jhamez84 16:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Quit your whining over my IP numbers will you. I haev alreday explained that ISP uses dynamic IP allocation and I have no control over what number I get.
81.131.68.146 01:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Shaw and Crompton Geography Resolution
Please do not use the talk page for purposes of character attacks. This page is a public page and will have much interest from school children - please respect this.
I haev alreday explained the wikipedia position on multiple accounts, vandalism, and other such things.
However, it appears that the edit war has now calmed somewhat, and the geography of Shaw and Crompton decieded. For those interested, I found the exact Misplaced Pages policy on town and place naming in Britain and can be found here . According to this, following encycolpedic standards (yes the encyclopedia Britanica uses this method!), broad and accepted consensus, and legal positioning, modern Metropolitan boroughs and counties stand as the foremost system which one should use (and quite rightfully so in my opinion) and thus all British location based articles should reflect this. Historic counties from the old system should be placed as a secondary location and with appropriate context for historical interest purposes.
A note is (this is according to the conventions; I am not being stubborn), modern metropolitan boroughs must not be placed secondary to the "ceremonial" or older county systems in any article.
Please can all past, present and future editors become familiar with this piece of Wiki policy and ammend the main article as necessary and when necessary. Please leave this part of the discussion up as a permenant reminder to all. Thank you for your co-operation Jhamez84 21:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism by wiki editor
There has been a disagreement over the presentation of the related geography. It was noted that the previous version showed bias against the way most people view the natural geography of the country so a more balanced version was drawn up and agreed upon. However, this has been repeatedly vandalised by Jhamez84 so please correct any adjustments he makes to the geographical information.
Thankyou,