This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carcharoth (talk | contribs) at 19:39, 28 March 2006 (→Disambiguation page styles). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:39, 28 March 2006 by Carcharoth (talk | contribs) (→Disambiguation page styles)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Title
What's an "ambiguous human name"? SlimVirgin 07:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguation page styles
(Copy of a question I posted at the Misplaced Pages:Help Desk and Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Biography)
I have been looking at several disambiguation pages for names (to get some ideas following work I did on Ptolemy (disambiguation)), and I've come across pages like Jesus (disambiguation) and Leonardo (disambiguation). Some questions I want to ask:
(1) The Leonardo (disambiguation) page has a bit allowing people to see all articles starting "Leonardo", or rather to see a list of AllPages starting from Leonardo, as seen here. This is the first time I've seen this, though the Leonardo disambiguation talk page led me to Robert, which does look a bit overdone, but also has the "AllPages" link. My question is whether this is a common practice, or whether it falls foul of the "no self-reference" rule about not linking to non-article space in Misplaced Pages (creates problems with mirror/redistribution sites)?
(2) Is is normal to (like I have done with Ptolemy) to arrange the disambiguation page in a historical sense, thus bringing out a narrative about the name throughout history, and tracing the links that sometimes exist, with certain uses of the name being inspired by one Ptolemy, and other uses being inspired by other Ptolemies? I ask this question because I feel a similar reorganisation of the Jesus disambiguation page could help make it easier to read as an article about the history of the name, rather than as a disambiguation page. Note that this could not be done with pages like Robert, as there is no such narrative thread to pull out of the history of the name.
(3) Is there a better place to discuss this?
Thanks. Carcharoth 19:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)