Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Ok you won: never more contribute by me in dalmatian articles ok? I'm not a sock, so thanks me for house of cerva and stop bother me or accusing me i'm not interested any more in YOUR influenced pages.
Another edit war
.
Hello, Director. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Director. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Director. You have new messages at Kubura's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Recent refactoring
Hello, Director. You have new messages at Sunray's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re:Regarding the sock article
Hello, Director. You have new messages at Τασουλα's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Timbouctou and you
I've closed the ANI thread and left a warning with Timbouctou. I trust you will avail yourself of the opportunity to move on. Should Timbouctou engage you again, please remain civil; your recent reactions were not entirely fault-free. I am sympathetic to your frustration, but remember that responding to incivility with incivility helps nothing. Thanks - KillerChihuahua21:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I know, but in my defense, this is like the sixteenth time Timbouctou jumped on me like that. When someone spends his days searching for ways to attack you and your reputation as an editor - and gets away with it more than once, it becomes hard not to retaliate at least in some measure.
I will indeed cease discussion for now, per your advice. The amazing thing is the person actually seems to agree with me anyway, believe it or not, so there isn't a real content issue to resolve. --DIREKTOR21:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Personality conflicts can be odd that way. But now, the ''seventeenth time this happens, which we hope will be never, you're going to not respond, and instead report and reference this discussion here, my warning, and the closed ANI thread, right? :-) KillerChihuahua22:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I replied on the discussion page there. Just to remind you, since you are the one who invited me to the discussion. You maybe forgot on this. --Wustenfuchs13:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry.. Chetniks again . Collaboration with the Nazis has been all-but blanked, and now Draza & Company apparently never committed ethnic cleansing against Croats and others. This group apparently thinks that, just because Serbian users are more likely to participate in the discussion, and therefore constitute a majority in the debate, they are allowed to ignore sources by simply declaring that a "consensus" has been reached. People just went away, I'm practically alone over there. --DIREKTOR13:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but can't help you there, topic ban for 6 months. You can countinue discussion on Serbs of Croatia whenever you can, I'll froze my activity there. I wish you all the best with Chetniks. --Wustenfuchs14:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello Director! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Please note: Harassment is defined as a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually (but not always) the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely. Harassment can also include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, where no direct communication takes place. Please don't do that. Thanks --Roberta F. (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Poštovani Direktore, neopravdano uklanjanje primjedbe o maltretiranju tj. uhođenju uz napomenu kako je riječ o troliranju, samo je još jedan primjer osobnog napada. Osobno s vama nisam imala nikakvog sukoba, osim molbi za postavljanjem novih inačica fotografija umjesto običnog presnimavanja što je u skladu s predloženom smjernicom, a zašto vi mijenjate fotografije drugih suradnika i postavljate neke nestvarne inačice, zaista ne znam. Enciklopedijski se sadržaj može poboljšavati na mnoge načine. Jedan od njih je i postavljanje najbolje ilustracije za neki članak, a kako Zoran Milanović na fotografiji koju ste obrezali iz zajedničke fotografije Zorana Milanovića s ostalim čelnicima Kukuriku koalicije gleda u pod i fotografija je niže razlučivosti od drugih dostupnih koje Zorana Milanovića bolje predstavljaju, logično bi bilo staviti bolju ilustraciju. Zašto vi ne želite da članak o Zoranu Milanoviću ima najbolju slobodnu fotografiju i prikazuje osobu u članku o njoj najboljom ilustracijom - ja to ne znam. Isto tako ne znam zašto uklanjate kvalitetniju ilustraciju u roku od jedne minute:
(cur | prev) 11:51, 4 November 2011 DIREKTOR (talk | contribs) (8,799 bytes) (Restoring status quo lead image. Once again, please take your proposal to the talkpage, and be assured noone is harassing you.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 11:49, 4 November 2011 Roberta F. (talk | contribs) (8,853 bytes) (Misplaced Pages:Harassment :-() (undo)
(cur | prev) 11:39, 4 November 2011 DIREKTOR (talk | contribs) (8,799 bytes) (Rv non-consensus removal of infobox photo. Roberta F, this is malicious editing - take your grievances to the talkpage.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 11:38, 4 November 2011 Roberta F. (talk | contribs) (8,712 bytes) (commonscat) (undo)
(cur | prev) 11:12, 4 November 2011 DIREKTOR (talk | contribs) (8,756 bytes) (undo)
(cur | prev) 11:11, 4 November 2011 Roberta F. (talk | contribs) (8,810 bytes) (image) (undo)
...
te meni predlažete otvaranje rasprave na razgovornoj stranici, umjesto da ste ju sami pokrenuli ako mislite kako je osoba drugim fotografijama prikazana lošijom ilustracijom i da je Zorana Milanovića bolje prikazati ilustracijom na kojoj mu se ne vide oči.
Ovakve doprinose vidim kao agresivne te stvaraju neugodan osjećaj kod suradnika kojima doprinose brzinski uklanjate ili slike presnimavate. Također uklanjate poruke i molbe drugih suradnika uz neodgovarajući komentar (kako na en:wiki, tako i na commonsu). Nažalost nisam jedina suradnica / suradnik kojemu gotovo ulijećete u uređivanja. Wikipedijski duh suradnje vidio bi se kada biste autore fotografija zamolili da sami obrežu fotografije i postave inačice bolje razlučivosti. Time bi projekt u cjelini bio na dobitku bez nepotrebnih rasprava i gaženja tuđega truda. Nadam se da nam je zajednički cilj - bolja Wikipedija. Lijep pozdrav --Roberta F. (talk) 10:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
