Misplaced Pages

This is a Misplaced Pages user discussion page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KillerChihuahua.

Talk to the Puppy To leave a message on this page, click here. If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply. If you message me on this page, I will probably reply on this page. If I messaged you on your page, please reply there. *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. *Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here. *Sign your post using four tildes ( ~~~~ )

24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives

User:Jonchapple

Hello KC. You left Jonchapple a notice of his topic ban here on October 20. Did you intend that he can still edit the talk pages of these articles? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

I didn't specify, I am so sorry. I'm inclined to let him edit the talk pages, but of course if he is disruptive we should extend the topic ban to include those as well. KillerChihuahua 19:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Is an editor about to get their second block for breaching your topic ban evidence enough of disruption? Mo ainm~Talk 21:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Despite another block, I find this type of edit disruptive, and this edit dose not mitigate the abuse. This can only be described as a very personal attack, accusing an editor of being a terrorist sympathiser.--Domer48_'fenian' 17:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Men's Rights

Hi KC! Just wanted to share this new edit with you as someone who has been moderating (when you can) the discussion at men's rights. Thanks! SarahStierch (talk) 03:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Just butting in - I notified User:Men's Tribune of the probation myself just now. However there is a serious (and obvious) COI issue ()which this user was already warned about but is choosing to ignore--Cailil 10:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you for letting me know, and thanks for notifying him, Callil - I see no further activity since the notification, so no action is needed at this time. KillerChihuahua 14:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

• Sorry to keep bugging you KC but certain issues are persisting. There's been more commentry from User:Kratch in the vein of those he was previously warned for; there's also been a couple of comments by user:extransit (formerly an admin aka user:icewedge, aka user:akirn) where he accuses SLP1 of lying and making arguments that are "obtuse in the extreme".
  Other than these behavioural issues we have an issue with User:DipWhip, who was notified of the probation yesterday after inserting OR (3 times) repeating that behaviour--Cailil 12:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

  DipWhip is still adding further OR--Cailil 20:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Michael Flood

In a seperate but related issue I just want to draw your attention to this. The topic probation obviously extends to that article wrt men's rights edits but there is also WP:BLP issue with that talk posting. This could do with some eyes on it--Cailil 02:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This edit by the user who was contacted is also ... interesting--Cailil 02:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Shakehandsman (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4: Moving forward

As a participant at Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4 and subsequent XfDs, would you take a look at Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4: Moving forward? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

That discussion seems to have been summarily closed. KillerChihuahua 01:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Shakehandsman (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

obvious

It is proverbial how you pushed and enacted the widest ban on wikipedia against me while it is allowed to delete a lot of well sourced academics contents worked during months in a very arduous process. Who did it? A user who was until some weeks banned because of his POV pushing agenda, an user who actually was also unblocked despite he used 6 sockpuppets (!!) and an user who does even does not care in passing over BLP policies in order to push his agenda. -- ClaudioSantos¿? 20:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)