Misplaced Pages

User talk:Crotalus horridus/Archive 2

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Crotalus horridus

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crotalus horridus (talk | contribs) at 17:15, 30 March 2006 (My final statement.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:15, 30 March 2006 by Crotalus horridus (talk | contribs) (My final statement.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Talk page archive.

This is disgraceful.
This Arbcom decision means that Wikipedians are expected to be perfect - to never make mistakes. I have made mistakes in the past, as have most other editors. It is unconscionable that occasional, isolated lapses in editing judgment have been twisted into a justification for punishments that have no relation to the alleged offenses, and which even the other party to arbitration has called "completely over the top" and "utterly bonkers" .
This decision means that none of my actual contributions to the encyclopedia matter - only my mistakes do. It means that no one can petition ArbCom without fear of retaliation, since no one is perfect.
I will not be contributing to Misplaced Pages again in the forseeable future.
- Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06.