Misplaced Pages

talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-12-19/In the news - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) at 05:29, 21 December 2011 (Criticism of Jimbo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:29, 21 December 2011 by Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) (Criticism of Jimbo)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

← Back to In the news

Discuss this story

Well, even if we don't get Wysiwyg, at least Misplaced Pages is easier to use than Facebook! (ducking for cover) :-) -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Facebook is easy to use, what are you talking about o_O. ResMar 04:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

It's no secret that I'm a critic of Jimbo, his cult of personality, and his willingness to both manipulate to further his own agenda but also deny the existence/effect of said cult of personality. I don't think that his intention was to whip up an international media frenzy when he started the thread on his talk page, but then removing that discussion without archiving it, after it had been covered by the international media... for god's sake that's a poor move. On a website that prided itself on a publicly viewable history for every change that is made, burying the conversation both looks improper and is rather ineffective. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)