Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Niteshift36 (talk | contribs) at 22:41, 27 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please place new messages at the BOTTOM of the page.

I detest stalkers, especially those who can't get their facts straight.

BJJFan

Hi Niteshift, I want to start updating some of the bjj fighters information on wiki.what would wiki consider reliable sources? I mean the only reliable source of bjj information seems to be from articles and news web sites spread out through the internet. Here are some examples: , , , those are the major online news for bjj and mma in the world. They publish monthly magazines as wellI mean would you consider those reliable sources? If not we have to shut down every major bjj competitor, because most information come from these sites. Also I've notice some fighters are adding the tournament results and fight records, in which are detailed information about their matches, what do you think about that? --Bjjfan232 (talk) 03:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Corkscrew store photo

that would be incredibly cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyapetty (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Niteshift as a proud former Force Recon Marine (1st Force Reconnaissaince Co) (15th MEU),with proud service in Iraq and Afghanistan and the person who has been editing the "Westies" site...I don't appreciate a fellow soldier calling me names and insulting me. You need to get your shit together like a REAL soldier and work this out with me like an adult.

Portal:Gang

I noticed that you been editing the Gang article . I just created a Portal (Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.--Zink Dawg -- 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Prod on David M. Malone

Drmies has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Wikiwings

		Wikiwings
		For extraordinary contributions to Aircraft in fiction, thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - Ahunt (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked. This barnstar is awarded to User:Niteshift36, for his dedication to compromise and his ability to work with other editors to come up with amicable solutions which satisfy everyone. Thank you for your valiant efforts to the project. Ikip (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Our earlier disputes

Hello, I'd like to formally apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused, on the stormfront (website) page. I think we all have heated opinions about this, but I look forward to working with you to make a better article for everyone. Cheers :) Mr. Kent (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Fox News Channel

I've left a warning to Gamaliel about his edit warring, so I obviously have to clarify that the same applies to you. If you revert again, I'll have to block, obviously. I do appreciate that you've gone to the talk page. If you're right that others also oppose the content Gamaliel is adding, you shouldn't have to revert next time (assuming there is a next time) because someone else can. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

No worries, Niteshift--I was happy to back you up there (that was easy anyway, since you were right). Man, some people need to get out more, so they don't have so many words left when they get here. Cheers! Drmies (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

NSPORT Revert

To answer your question "where was that discussion?" – there was none. There are approximately two active members of a very small Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Triathlon. This change was made based on my knowledge of the sport and after reviewing a past AfD that cited this aspect of NSPORT. Do you have a knowledgeable opinion on this change, or know of another Misplaced Pages group that would, other than the project triathlon group? For what it's worth, I created the existing text and language that you currently see under WP:NSPORT#Triathlon. Barkeep/_$ 19:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I am a member of the project. I would have noticed a discussion had there been one, which is what confused me. The last time I posted anything on the projects talk page, it got no response. There was also nobody participating when I started a discussion at the NSport talk page about the standards for triathletes except me and an editor who really didn't know much about the sport. . So when nobody discusses it anywhere and then makes changes to the standards, yeah, I ask where the discussion was. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I probably could've posted the proposed change on the Project page, but usually when I ask questions on prominent triathlon articles' talk pages I get zero response. I (perhaps incorrectly) assumed I would've received the same as well there. As for the old NSPORT#Triathlon discussion, I missed that one as I don't monitor that page. I'll take a look at the archived discussion that was had back in October and weigh if needed. Barkeep/_$ 21:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Nick Christie

Please tell me why you think my sources were not reliable. Perhaps Fox News would be more reliable to you. If that is indeed that case then I have already reverted those changes with the new more reliable source.

• Sourcewise, Care2 is an advocacy group. The "reporter" isn't listed on the staff, nor does there appear to be a lot of editorial oversight. It's worth noting that another experienced editor also questioned the source. Regardless of that, the item doesn't belong in the Lee County article, irrespective of the source. The item is hardly significant in the history of the county. It is a good example of WP:RECENTISM. The fact that the story has been larely ignored by everyone except advoccy sites should be a good indicator that the story will fail the "10 year test" that RECENTISM suggests. Whiile the death is important to the family, in terms of the history of Lee County, it's not notable.