This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobak (talk | contribs) at 20:39, 3 April 2006 (→Drawbacks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:39, 3 April 2006 by Bobak (talk | contribs) (→Drawbacks)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Is it just me, or does this seem slightly like an advertisement? (Pardon me if I'm wrong, that could just be my opinion :)) Julianne
- Yea the whole "This is an example of the kind of design touch that sets Herman Miller apart." seems a little NPOV to me, anyone interested in adding more about the chair and less about the designer? Mbisanz 00:11, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Possibly, I really like the Aeron chairs at my office. It is one of the few chairs I can sit in for long periods of time without pain and discomfort. Overall I think its design is quite unique. It is also very Ergonomic. Unfortunately when a company like Herman Miller is producing high-end product or something that is different it becomes difficult to not use some un-slanted language. Probably most of the articles that cover any product and/or company could seem like an advertisement from one degree to another. Bdelisle 08:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- What about the C2 wiki page on the chair? It has a little story about how well-linked pages rank very high on Google, and how much Alpha Geeks influence other geeks. It could be a testimony to the "cultness" of the chair. I am now shopping for an Aeron chair, because Joel Spolsky mentioned them. -Olle Jonsson
Drawbacks
Many have noted the lack of upholstery fails to muffle or filter flatulence, a feature many will realize they have relied on from traditional chairs once adopting this fashion accessory. Also, many note the ridgid sides of the seat may be quite uncomfortable.
- If you're an enormous, flatulent individual then yes, the Aeron may not be right for you. Bobak 20:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)