Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PSYCH (talk | contribs) at 03:33, 4 April 2006 (reverted right wing fundy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, PSYCH, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG 14:25, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

I don't know who the other guy is, but of course I'm the anon guy. The admins (the real unbiased admins unlike yourself) told me I ned to reg to be taken seriously with a complaint. The fact that you are much like a Nazi (you seem to think it's your right to spread false truths about the lib party, and your anti-gay adoption and marriage views speak volumes about the type of person you are). Not to mention you wasted time and effort to get "some developer" (who I'm sure shares your bigoted views) to find something "out."

Seeing as how you're more interested in propaganda than the truth, this post probably won't have a long shelf life. We know you like to spin the truth to ensure yourself and your party are seen in a positive light.

I hope Mark knows where you stand on these issues. - PSYCH 06:48, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

How can it be a personal attack when he uses these beliefs to promote lies in an encyclopedia? He has repeatedly used his bias to change the facts on the Liberal Party of Australia page. All attempts to get the false information corrected have been fruitless. How can he still be allowed to spread propaganda without reprimand? Regardless, his accusation that I was another user can also be considered a personal attack, and mine simply a retaliation. - PSYCH 00:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Are you planning on editing any articles, or are you just here to make personal attacks? This is unacceptable. You really need to start contributing, or you will be considered a problem user and can be blocked from editing. RickK 09:19, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

At the time of my original edits on the page Liberal Party of Australia, I was unregistered. Since then I have registered, as I mentioned on the talk page. It was on the TALK page; I linked to for people to actually read.

Every time I edited (anonymously, I didn't realise I had to register to edit, but my IP address shows I have) they were incorrectly removed by Xtra because they did not match his POV as I have mentioned countless times.

Regardless, the data on the wikipedia page is incorrect, and every attempt to change it has been thwarted. - PSYCH 10:46, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

ALP conflict

First, welcome to wikipedia. I see you are involved with your first edit war, and first revert war. They happen, but aren't the best way of getting things done most of the time. It also helps not to attack people too much, because that way when you appeal decisions to others, they are more likely to see your side.

My advice on this one is quit while you are ahead - neo-liberalism doesn't mean what you think it means, it is an ideology related to globalism and to some extent with laissez-faire policies and privatization. The ALP is neo-liberal, balanced budgets, selling off state interests, free trade and lower regulation. Neo-liberalism doesn't have much to say about social issues, and in fact many economic neo-liberals are conservatives. The usage of the word comes from the late 19th century version of the word liberalism, which advocated reductions in trade barriers, and, in some cases, free banking.

>>EDIT: The Liberal Party is neo-liberal, balanced budgets, selling off state interests, free trade , including having an unethical maximum 8 year HECS quota, and increasing fees by 25%.

Social issues

I like your social issue beliefs. Excellent.--SqueakBox 03:04, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Thankyou, - PSYCH 10:38, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

i was not cautioned. read the result. it is not POV. in any case user pages do not need to conform to NPOV. please stop vandalizing my page. Xtra 12:31, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

the motion of admonishment failed. the only user who the arbitration committee made any sort of order against was you. read the case. Xtra 12:53, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

you have the gaul to tell me not to edit your talk page after you have repetedly put up false and inflamatory information on mine? you leave me alone and i will leave you alone. Xtra 05:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

even if i could remove it i wouldnt. Xtra 14:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• • please do not vandalise my page once I have already deleted your abuse. Not wise to repeatedly display such antisocial behaviour on my talk page. -- PSYCH 08:48, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User page

Hey PSYCH. Just reading over your user page and "a few of beliefs" (which I, in the main, agree with) and noticed that you have written that you "OPPOSE government funding of all schools" where I presume you meant all private schools. Thanks, --Cyberjunkie 10:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

So corrected, oops! :P PSYCH 01:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)