Misplaced Pages

User talk:71.178.106.120

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WGFinley (talk | contribs) at 17:04, 1 February 2012 (Discretionary Sanctions: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:04, 1 February 2012 by WGFinley (talk | contribs) (Discretionary Sanctions: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

February 2012

Per Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico, you have already been notified how your actions violate the applicable policies, and I am filing a formal request regarding this WP:ARBMAC violation at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. --Joy (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you continue with the behavior on Giorgio da Sebenico, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

While there is no rule against editing anonymously, editing anonymously in a disputed topic area such as this one will lead to allegations of sockpuppetry against you whether well founded or not. I would suggest you may want to reconsider editing anonymously in this topic space. Also, your definition of consensus as reflected in this edit is not accurate. Consensus ≠ unanimity. You may want to check out a section on the policy at WP:TALKDONTREVERT as well as the essay on tendentious editing as continuing to make edits like that one could subject you to sanction. --WGFinley (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


User infoThis is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.