Misplaced Pages

Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JCAla (talk | contribs) at 09:28, 2 March 2012 (Pakistani government reaction: only?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:28, 2 March 2012 by JCAla (talk | contribs) (Pakistani government reaction: only?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War
LocationEast Pakistan now Bangladesh
DateMarch 1971 - December 1971
Targetwomen, chidren and men in Bangladesh (then East Pakistan)
Deaths3 million
Perpetrators1,597 charged

During the Bangladesh Liberation War, rape was committed by members of the Pakistani military and the militias that supported them. Over a period of nine months, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were raped. Susan Brownmiller, in her report on the atrocities, said that girls from the age of eight to grandmothers of seventy-five suffered attacks. The abuses were only stopped by the intervention of the Indian armed forces. Eastern Pakistan seceded and became the independent nation of Bangladesh. In 2009 a report named 1,597 people as having helped carry out the abuses and a commission was established to prosecute those accused.

Background

In 1948, a few months after the partition of India, Mohammad Ali Jinnah tried to impose Urdu as the national language. In a speech at a meeting in Dhaka, he said,

Let me make it very clear to you that the state language of Pakistan will be Urdu and no other language. Anyone who tries to mislead you is really the enemy of Pakistan. Without one language, no nation can remain solidly tied together and function. Look at the history of other countries. Therefore, so far as the state language is concerned, Pakistan's shall be Urdu.

This declaration came in spite of the fact that only 4% of Pakistan's population spoke Urdu at the time. He branded those who supported the use of Bengali as communists, traitors and enemies of the state. The refusal by successive governments to recognize Bengali as the second national language led to the formation of the Bengali language movement and to more support for the newly formed Awami League. A protest in Dhaka in 1952 was forcibly broken up, resulting in the deaths of several protesters. Nationalists viewed those who had died as martyrs for their cause, and the violence led to calls for secession. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 caused further grievances, as the East was cut off from the West within an hour of the start of the war, because the military had assigned no units to the defense of the region.

In December 1970 the East Pakistan based Awami League headed by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman won a national majority in the first democratic general election since the independence of Pakistan. However the West Pakistani establishment prevented them from forming a government. Former president Yahya Khan then banned the Awami League and declared martial law. On 26 March 1971 the Pakistan Army launched Operation Searchlight against the supporters of a nascent Bengali nationalism, indiscriminately killing Bengali civilians. In the resultant civil conflict the Pakistan Army employed systematic violence against civilians, resulting in the deaths of up to 3 million, creating up to 10 million refuges who fled to India, and displacing a further 30 million.

Pakistani Army actions

The intensity of the West Pakistani military action surprised international observers and Bengali nationalists, since the pro-democracy movement had been peaceful till then. Between the middle of May and September 1971, the Pakistani army dug in and remained in their strongholds, from which they conducted operations against villagers who may have helped the liberation movement. Genocide scholar Samuel Totten has accused the army of using organized rape as a weapon of war and has cited reports of the commander of the Dhaka operations saying "he would kill four million people in 48 hours and thus have a 'Final Solution' of the Bengali problem". They also conducted nighttime raids, assaulting women in their villages, often in front of their families, to "punish" and terrorize. Girls and women were also kidnapped and held in special camps were they were repeatedly raped and gang-raped. Many of those held in the camps were murdered or committed suicide. In what has been described as a deliberate attempt to destroy an entire ethnic group, many of those assaulted were raped, murdered and then bayonetted in the genitalia. Totten alleges elements of racism in the Pakistan army, who he says considered the Bengalis "racially inferior—a non-martial and physically weak race". The final week of the war saw the worst of the atrocities. With defeat certain, the Government conducted a premeditated campaign of genocide. Entire villages were razed to the ground and the inhabitants killed. Over a two-day period intellectuals and professionals were taken from their homes and murdered. Their names were found in the diary of Major-General Rao Farman Ali.

Militias

According to Peter Tomsen, the Inter-Services Intelligence in conjunction with Jamaat-e-Islami formed militias such as Al-Badr ("the moon") and the Al-Shams ("the sun") to conduct operations against the nationalist movement. Local collaborators known as Razakars also took part in the atrocities. The term has since become a pejorative akin to the western term "Judas".

International reaction

The events of the nine-month conflict are widely viewed as genocide. Adam Jones has said that were the upper estimates of those killed correct this conflict would be comparable to the Rwandan genocide and the executions of Soviet troops by Nazi Germany. The atrocities in East Pakistan were the first instance of war rape to garner international media attention, and Sally J. Scholz has written that this was the first genocide to capture the interest of the mass media.

Aparajeyo Bangla: A statue on the Bangladesh Liberation War, located at the center of Dhaka University Campus

Time magazine reported on girls who had been kidnapped and held in military brothels:

One of the more horrible revelations concerns 563 young Bengali women, some only 18, who have been held captive inside Dacca's dingy military cantonment since the first days of the fighting. Seized from Dacca University and private homes and forced into military brothels, the girls are all three to five months pregnant. The army is reported to have enlisted Bengali gynecologists to abort girls held at military installations. But for those at the Dacca cantonment it is too late for abortion. The military has begun freeing the girls a few at a time, still carrying the babies of Pakistani soldiers

Liz Trotta reported in 1972 from a village suffering from the aftermath of the conflict. She interviewed a 16-year-old widow whose husband had been murdered in front of her before she was raped, making her pregnant. The Pakistani government had tried to censor reports coming out of the region, but media reports on the atrocities did reach the public, and gave rise to widespread support for the liberation movement. It is believed that India's intervention was supported by the majority of states under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter and on humanitarian grounds. In an interview in 1972 Indira Gandhi justified the use of military intervention, saying, "Shall we sit and watch their women get raped?"

The Nixon administration aligned with Pakistan as part of its military strategy against communist expansion into the region, but American public support for the people of Bangladesh was increased by televised reports coming from the region. Senator Edward Kennedy commented that they had done nothing worse than to win an election. The events were discussed extensively in the British House of Commons. John Stonehouse proposed a motion which was supported by a further 200 Members of Parliament:

That this House believes that the widespread murder of civilians and the atrocities on a massive scale by the Pakistan Army in East Bengal, contrary to the United Nations Convention on Genocide signed by Pakistan itself, confirms that the military Government of Pakistan has forfeited all rights to rule East Bengal, following its wanton refusal to accept the democratic will of the people expressed in the election of December, 1970; therefore believes that the United Nations Security Council must be called urgently to consider the situation both as a threat to international peace and as a contravention of the Genocide Convention; and further believes that until order is restored under United Nations supervision, the provisional Government of Bangla Desh should be recognised as the vehicle for the expression of self-determination by the people of East Bengal.

Although this motion was presented twice before parliament, the government did not find time to debate it.

Critics of the United Nations have used the 1971 atrocities to argue that military intervention was the only thing to stop the mass murder.

On 1 August 1971 George Harrison and Ravi Shankar organized The Concert for Bangladesh which raised almost $240,000 for the refugees.

Aftermath

Estimates of those raped vary from two hundred thousand to four hundred thousand. After the conflict the victims went through a second ordeal: widespread sexual infections and feelings of intense shame and humiliation. Many of the women were ostracized by their families and communities, and others committed suicide. A doctor at the rehabilitation center in Dhaka reported 170,000 abortions of pregnancies caused by the rapes, and 30,000 war babies being born.

Estimates of the number of pregnancies range from 25,000 to the Bangladeshi government figure of 70,000. Observers suggested that some of these pregnancies were intended by the soldiers and perhaps their officers as well. A report from the International Commission of Jurists said, "Whatever the precise numbers, the teams of American and British surgeons carrying out abortions and the widespread government efforts to persuade people to accept these girls into the community, testify to the scale on which raping occurred". The Commission also said that Pakistani officers not only allowed their men to rape, but also enslaved women themselves.

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman called the victims birangona ("heroine"), but this only underscored the fact that these women were now deemed socially unacceptable as they were "dishonored", and the term became associated with barangona ("prostitute"). The women's human rights organization Bangladesh Mahila Parishat took part in the war by publicizing the atrocities being carried out by the Pakistani army. In 1996 Nilima Ibrahim wrote Ami Birangana Bolchi (The Voices of War Heroines), a collection of eyewitness testimony from seven rape victims, which she documented while working for a rehabilitation center.

In 2009, after a 19-year investigation, the War Crimes Fact Finding Committee released documentation naming 1,597 people they said to be responsible for the atrocities. The list included members of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, a political group founded in 1978. In 2010 the government of Bangladesh set up an International Crimes Tribunal to investigate the atrocities of that era. However, human rights advocates are of the opinion that the mass rapes and killings of women may not be addressed. Irene Khan has said of her own government's reaction:

A conservative Muslim society has preferred to throw a veil of negligence and denial on the issue, allowed those who committed or colluded with gender violence to thrive, and left the women victims to struggle in anonymity and shame and without much state or community support.

Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh Deputy Leader Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, the first person to face charges related to the conflict, has been indicted by the tribunal for twenty counts of war crimes, including murder, rape and arson. He has denied all charges. Four other members of Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, including Motiur Rahman Nizami, have also been indicted for war crimes. Human Rights Watch has supported the tribunal, and they have also been critical of reported harassment of lawyers representing the accused. Brad Adams, director of the Asia branch of Human Rights Watch, said:

If the Bangladeshi government wants these trials to be taken seriously it must ensure that the rights of the accused are fully respected. That means making sure that lawyers and witnesses don't face threats or coercion.

Media depictions

Orunodoyer Ognishakhi (Pledge to a New Dawn), the first film about the war, was screened in 1972 on the first Bangladeshi Independence Day celebration. It draws on the experiences of an actor called Altaf. While trying to reach safe haven in Calcutta he encounters women who have been raped. The images of these birangona, stripped and vacant-eyed from the trauma, are used as testimony to the assault. Other victims Altaf meets are shown committing suicide or having lost their minds. In 2011 the film Meherjaan was shown at the Guwahati International Film Festival. It explores the war from two perspectives: that of a woman who loved a Pakistani soldier and that of a person born from rape.

Pakistani government reaction

Hamood-ur-Rehman with Pakistani prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto

After the conflict the Pakistani government decided on a policy of silence regarding the rapes. They also set up the Hamoodur Rahman Commission, which was highly critical of the army. The chiefs of staff of both the army and the Pakistan Air Force were removed from their positions for attempting to interfere with the commission. The report was compiled by Hamoodur Rahman, who interviewed politicians, officers and senior commanders. The final reports were submitted in July 1972. They were all destroyed except for one held by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, and the findings were never made public. In 1974 the commission was reopened and issued a supplementary report, which remained classified for 25 years until the magazine India Today published it. The report said that 26,000 people were killed and that the rapes numbered in the hundreds. Political Scientist Sumit Ganguly believes that the Pakistani establishment has yet to come to terms with the atrocities carried out, saying that, in a visit to Bangladesh in 2002, Pervez Musharraf expressed regret for the atrocities rather than accepting responsibility.

See also

References

  1. Ghadbian, Najib (2002). Kent Worcester, Sally A. Bermanzohn, Mark Ungar (ed.). Violence and politics: globalization's paradox. Routledge. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-415-93111-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  2. ^ Debnath, Angela (2009). Samuel Totten (ed.). Plight and fate of women during and following genocide (7th ed.). Transaction. p. 49. ISBN 978-1-4128-0827-9.
  3. Zaman, Shahaduz (2007). Broken limbs, broken lives: ethnography of a hospital ward in Bangladesh. Het Spinhuis. p. 42. ISBN 978-9055892297.
  4. Thompson, H R. (2007). Andrew Simpson (ed.). Language and national identity in Asia. Oxford University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-19-926748-4.
  5. Shah, Mehtab Ali (1997). The foreign policy of Pakistan: ethnic impacts on diplomacy, 1971–1994. I.B.Tauris. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-86064-169-5.
  6. Tollefson, James W. (2006). Amy Tsui, James W. Tollefson (ed.). Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts. Routledge. p. 245. ISBN 978-0-8058-5693-4. {{cite book}}: More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
  7. Enskat, Mike (2004). Political parties in South Asia. Praeger. p. 217. ISBN 978-0275968328. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  8. Harder, Hans (2010). Werner Ende, Udo Steinbac (ed.). Islam in the world today: a handbook of politics, religion, culture, and society. Cornell University Press. p. 351. ISBN 978-0-8014-4571-2.
  9. Haggett, Peter (2001). (2nd ed.). Marshall Cavendish. p. 2716. ISBN 978-0761472896. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  10. Roy, Rituparna (2010). South Asian Partition Fiction in English: From Khushwant Singh to Amitav Ghosh (1st ed.). Amsterdam University Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-90-8964-245-5.
  11. Sisson, Richard (1992). War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh. University of California Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-520-07665-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. Southwick, Katherine (2011). Brad K. Blitz, Maureen Jessica Lynch (ed.). Statelessness and Citizenship: A Comparative Study on the Benefits of Nationality. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 119. ISBN Edward Elgar Publishing. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)
  13. Heinze, Eric (2009). Waging Humanitarian War. SUNY. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-7914-7695-6.
  14. ^ Totten, Samuel. Dictionary of Genocide: A-L. Volume 1: Greenwood. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-313-32967-8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: location (link)
  15. ^ Totten, Samuel (2008). William S. Parsons (ed.). Century of genocide: critical essays and eyewitness accounts (3rd ed.). Routledge. p. 250. ISBN 978-0-415-99084-4.
  16. ^ Totten, Samuel (2008). William S. Parsons (ed.). Century of genocide: critical essays and eyewitness accounts (3rd ed.). Routledge. p. 248. ISBN 978-0-415-99084-4.
  17. Thomas, Dorothy Q. (1998). Sabrina P. Ramet (ed.). Gender Politics in the Western Balkans: Women, Society and Politics in Yugoslavia and the Yugoslav Successor States. Pennsylvania State University. p. 204. ISBN 978-0-271-01802-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  18. Jahan, R. (2004). Samuel Totten (ed.). Teaching about genocide: issues, approaches, and resources. Information Age Publishing. pp. 147–148. ISBN 978-1-59311-074-1.
  19. Arens, Jenneke (2010). Samuel Totten, Robert K. Hitchcock (ed.). Genocide of indigenous peoples. Transaction. p. 128. ISBN 978-1-4128-1495-9.
  20. Schmid, Alex (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research. Routledge. p. 600. ISBN 978-0-415-41157-8.
  21. Tomsen, Peter (2011). Wars of Afghanistan. Public Affairs. p. 240. ISBN 978-1-58648-763-8.
  22. ^ Mookherjee, Nayanika (2009). Sharika Thiranagama, Tobias Kelly (ed.). Traitors: Suspicion, Intimacy, and the Ethics of State-Building. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-8122-4213-3. Cite error: The named reference "Mookherjee" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  23. Simms, Brendan (2011). Brendan Simms, D. J. B. Trim (ed.). Humanitarian Intervention: A History. Cambridge University Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-521-19027-5.
  24. Jones, Adam (2010). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge. p. 281. ISBN 978-0-415-48618-7.
  25. ^ Scholz, Sally J. (2006). Steven Lee (ed.). Intervention, terrorism, and torture: contemporary challenges to just war theory. Springer. p. 277. ISBN 978-1-4020-4677-3.
  26. Scholz, Sally J. (2011). Deen K. Chatterjee (ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. p. 388. ISBN 978-1-4020-9159-9.
  27. Hadden, Briton; Henry Robinson Luce (1971). "Time Volume 98". Time.
  28. Trotta, Liz (20 February 1972). "Bangladesh Genocide: Rape Victims". NBC.
  29. Dixit, Jyotindra Nath (2002). India-Pakistan in war and peace. Routledge. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-415-30472-6.
  30. Glennon, Michael J. (2003). Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo. Palgrave MacMillan. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4039-6366-6.
  31. Lee, Steven P. (2011). Ethics and War: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-521-72757-0.
  32. ^ Mani, Bakirathi (2012). Aspiring to Home: South Asians in America. Stanford University Press. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-8047-7800-8. Cite error: The named reference "Mani" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  33. "Business of the House (Hansard, 17 June 1971)". House of Commons. Retrieved 24 February 2012.
  34. Smith, Karen E. (2010). Genocide and the Europeans. Cambridge University Press. pp. 85–86. ISBN 978-0-521-13329-6.
  35. Ball, Howard (2011). Genocide: A Reference Handbook. ABC Clio. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-59884-488-7.
  36. ^ Saikia, Yasmin (2011). Elizabeth D. Heineman (ed.). Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones: From the Ancient World to the Era of Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-8122-4318-5.
  37. Riedel, Bruce O. (2011). Deadly embrace: Pakistan, America, and the future of the global jihad. Brookings Institution. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8157-0557-4.
  38. ^ Siddiqi, Dina M. (2008). Bonnie G. Smith (ed.). Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History (Volume 1 ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 202. ISBN 978-0-19-514890-9.
  39. Mohsin, Amena (2005). Samir Kumar Das (ed.). Peace processes and peace accords. Sage. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-7619-3391-5.
  40. Enloe, Cynthia H. (2000). Maneuvers: the international politics of militarizing women's lives. University of California Press. p. 340. ISBN 978-0-520-22071-3.
  41. Secretariat, The (1972). The events in East Pakistan, 1971: a legal study. International Commission of Jurists. p. 40.
  42. Ghadbian, Najib (2002). Kent Worcester, Sally A. Bermanzohn, Mark Ungar (ed.). Violence and politics: globalization's paradox. Routledge. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-415-93111-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  43. Nasreen, Taslima (1998). Herbert L. Bodman, Nayereh E. Tohidi (ed.). Women in Muslim societies: diversity within unity. Lynne Rienner. p. 209. ISBN 978-1-55587-578-7.
  44. Bradby, Hannah (2010). Global Perspectives on War, Gender and Health. Ashgate. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-7546-7523-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  45. Armbruster, Heidi (2009). Taking Sides: Ethics, Politics, and Fieldwork in Anthropology. Berghahn. p. 78. ISBN 978-1-84545-701-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  46. Alffram, Henrik (2009). Ignoring executions and torture: impunity for Bangladesh's security forces. Human Rights Watch. p. 11. ISBN 1-56432-483-4.
  47. ^ Roy, Nilanjana S. (August 24, 2010). "Bangladesh War's Toll on Women Still Undiscussed". New York Times.
  48. Of India, Press Trust (November 20, 2011). "Bangladesh 1971 war crimes trial begins". Hindustan Times.
  49. Dhaka, Associated Press (October 3, 2011). "Bangladesh party leader accused of war crimes in 1971 conflict". The Guardian.
  50. Adams, Brad (May 18, 2011). "Letter to the Bangladesh Prime Minister regarding the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act". Human Rights Watch.
  51. Adams, Brad (NOVEMBER 2, 2011). "Bangladesh: Stop Harassment of Defense at War Tribunal". Thomson Reuters Foundation. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. Mookherjee, Nayanika (2009). Sharika Thiranagama, Tobias Kelly (ed.). Traitors: suspicion, intimacy, and the ethics of state-building. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-8122-4213-3.
  53. Mookherjee, Nayanika (2006). Navnita Chadha Behera (ed.). Gender, conflict and migration. Sage. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-7619-3455-4.
  54. Reporter, Staff (February 10, 2011). "Bangla movie Meherjan to be screened today". Assam Tribune.
  55. Jones, Owen Bennett (2003). Pakistan: eye of the storm. Yale University Press. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-300-10147-8.
  56. Malik, Anas (2010). Political survival in Pakistan: beyond ideology. Routledge. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-415-77924-1.
  57. Saikia, Yasmin (2011). Women, War, and the Making of Bangladesh: Remembering 1971. Duke University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-8223-5038-5.
  58. Wynbrandt, James (2009). A Brief History of Pakistan (1st ed.). Facts On File. p. 203. ISBN 978-0-8160-6184-6.
  59. Trivedi, Ramesh (2008). India's relations with her neighbours. Gyan Publishing. p. 108. ISBN 978-81-8205-438-7.
  60. Ganguly, Sumit (2010). Jacques Bertrand, André Laliberté (ed.). Multination States in Asia: Accommodation Or Resistance. Cambridge University Press. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-521-14363-9.

External links

Categories: