Remote viewing - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grizzly (talk | contribs) at 06:41, 7 December 2002 (Corrected spelling of "Some"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:41, 7 December 2002 by Grizzly (talk | contribs) (Corrected spelling of "Some")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Remote viewing (RV) is a form of clairvoyance by which a viewer is said to use his or her clairvoyant abilities to "view", i.e. gather information on a target consisting of an object, place, person, etc, which is hidden from physical view of the viewer and typically separated from the viewer in space by some distance, and sometimes separated in time (future or past) as well.

Mainstream science in general tends to ignore the subject. Some scientists who deal with it consider it to be a fictitious phenomenon, and dismiss studies into it as pseudoscience at best and frequently allege fraud.

Remote viewing is distinguished from other forms of clairvoyance in that it follows a specific protocol (or some variant of it) as developed in a US government-sponsored program at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California, which was begun in the early 1970s and continued until 1995.

Over time the program had a series of names (or perhaps sub-projects which had specific names) of which the most recent and perhaps most well-known was STAR GATE. Since the government-funding of the program was ended in 1995 there has been an increase in publicly available RV services and training offered by several of the principals who were involved over time in the program (as well as by others).

Under the remote viewing family of protocols, the viewer is not explicitly told what the target is; rather it is specified in one of several ways. One common method is that the target is described either in writing or by a photograph or by some set of coordinates (e.g. latitude & longitude), the latter of which may be encrypted. The description is then placed in a double-set of opaque envelopes which may be shown to the viewer, but which the viewer is not allowed to open during the viewing session. The viewer then writes down whatever information he can gather about the target, typically including drawings and gestalt impressions as well as visual details (and sometimes auditory or kinesthetic details as well). The viewing session is administered by a second person called the monitor, who typically also is not given any information about the target. The viewer is typically given information about the target after the viewing session, especially during training sessions. In the opinion of its proponents, remote viewing is a skill that typically improves with training, and certain variations of the protocol are used during training.

Some variations on the remote viewing protocol have adjectives, such as Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV), which is the stem protocol developed during the first part of the program; Technical Remote Viewing (TRV), which is a trademarked term of one company's offered training; Associative Remote Viewing (ARV), a variant used by Greg Kolodziejzyk to answer binary (yes/no) questions, particularly those about future events.

History

For some time in the 20th century the CIA monitored science programs in the USSR, particularly those related to intelligence and military applications. When they learned that the USSR had serious programs pursuing the development and application of psi abilities, they decided to fund research to evaluate the potential threat from this direction.

As a result, in the early 1970s the US government contracted with the Stanford Research Institute to investigate these questions. Dr. Hal Puthoff, one of the physicists there, who had already established a name for himself in laser physics, worked on the project and, in reviewing information made available to him regarding projects behind the iron curtain, wrote that there seemed to be sufficient evidence to warrant scientific investigation into psi abilities.

Around that time, on the east coast of the US, Ingo Swann had attained some note as the subject of a series of experiments designed and conducted by Dr. Karlis Osis of the American Society for Psychical Research. These had produced positive, reasonably repeatable results in precursors to the remote viewing protocols. In 1972, Swann was put into contact with Hal Puthoff by Cleve Backster (father of modern polygraph testing), and they arranged a meeting at SRI. As a result of their meeting, Puthoff hired Swann to work on the program.

Very early on (even from their first visit) they believed that they had sufficiently convincing evidence of psi phenomenon. The continued funding of the program therefore was not concerned with establishing the existence of psi phenomenon, but rather with characterizing it and determining to what extent psi abilities could be controlled or reduced to practice, i.e. whether psi abilities could be developed or trained in individuals and used to gather information remotely on a practical basis.

Projects were carried on in two subdomains of research, with some overlapping of personnel. One subdomain was oriented to and resulted in refinements to the remote viewing protocol. Some led to increases in the efficacy of the protocol and training methods; others addressed the scientific concerns with avoiding invalid experimental design. The other subdomain was application oriented: the actual gathering of information on real targets that government clients were interested in.

After nearly two decades of activity the program moved from SRI to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in 1989, which was actually more a splitting of a new entity off of SRI.

In 1995 the justification for further government funding of the program was put under review, conflicting reports were issued by Drs. Jessica Utts (who believed) and Ray Hyman (who didn't), and the decision was made to stop funding the program.

Afterwards, many of the principals who had been involved with the program at various times in the program went into "private practice", offering remote viewing services and trainings as well as publishing more information on the history and current state of the art of RV.

Many organizations today practice RV or offer training in RV. According to some of the self-described RV experts, some of these offerings and activities bear little resemblance to "true" RV protocols and therefore should not be named as such, but there is little to be done about it since the term "remote viewing" is not legally protected.

Applications

Remote viewing was originally developed under a US government-sponsored program, with an eye toward intelligence-gathering applications for the CIA and military clients. Some RV proponents state that they suspect that some US government agencies still make ongoing use of RV activities. RV proponents also claim that a number of foreign states engage in RV activities.

RV proponents also claim that RV has found applications outside the government. It has been claimed to have been used in marine archeology (see papers at the IRVA site), criminal investigations, and commercial information gathering (not to say corporate espionage).

Names of Note

Lyn Buchanan, viewer.
Ed Dames, viewer.
Edwin May, program member since mid-1970s and STAR GATE program director from 1986 until the close of the program.
Joe McMoneagle, one of the early viewers.
Hal Puthoff, physicist and original program director.
Paul Smith, viewer credited with authoring/editing the original CRV training manual.
Ingo Swann, artist and primary subject (not to say "psychic") and co-developer with Puthoff & company of the original RV protocol(s).
Russel Targ, physicist and program member.

External Links

The two conflicting reports:

Ray Hyman's report "The Evidence for Psychic Functioning: Claims vs. Reality"
Jessica Utts' report An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning