Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bueller 007

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FWBOarticle (talk | contribs) at 11:20, 12 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:20, 12 April 2006 by FWBOarticle (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Nanking Massacre

I wish you luck. Unfortunately, this page is extremely controversial and has consistently been hijacked by POV warriors (Chinese nationalists) who are not interested in trying to present a balanced or considered analysis of the massacre; their purpose is to advertise the horror of the massacre and the culpability of the Japanese to the hilt. Their weapon is to dismiss anything that challenges or calls into question the hardline Chinese view as "revisionist". All Japanese sources are considered ipso facto suspect, which is a good indication of their mentality. I don't think your POV tag will go unchallenged.

Later note: I have now been accused of having a "blatant anti-chinese biase" and of making "inflammatory remarks" by an ethnic Chinese contributor living in Australia. As I said, I wish you luck. User:Bathrobe

Thanks for the note; I won't delete it. I agree that the problem exists on both sides. It's a sad state of affairs.

Bathrobe 11:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry about being away so long. :) I'm involved in a big and "productive" edit and I was keeping myself away from edit war(s). For one, you can delete anything which doesn't have source. FWBOarticle