Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs) at 03:51, 13 April 2006 (→General user conduct: -Move MereCat up, not approved yet, not even properly made). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• ]

Comments about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct

Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

• Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

• Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Merecat refuses to discuss controversial edits and no has started making accusations and personal attacks on Talk:Rationales to impeach George W. Bush.-- Nomen Nescio 03:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I am pretty sure this has not met the 2 person threshold. Merecat 03:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/-Lumière Refusing to accept consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view and other policy pages and attempting to force the issue. Multiple accounts.
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Mikeabundo
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Eyeonvaughan – Consistently violates WP:NPOV and brings his own personal/political agenda into discussions and edits. Is the cause of a number of edit wars and continuously violates WP:NPA by attacking my character. pm_shef 04:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Go for it! - Unwilling to take wikiquette criticisms seriously. --Quiddity 06:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Sam Spade - When he is in a dispute and outnumber by consensus (Socialism, Human, God), he reverts without discussion (or very little of it) and fails to stay cool and makes some uncivil comments. -- infinity0 17:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/WAREL - widespread flounting of consensus at math articles. -lethe 01:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/SPUI - Extensive disruptive behavior in violation of the terms of his probation. --phh 02:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Rms125a@hotmail.com Civility, POV, sockpuppetry, 3RR, block evasion on Ireland-related articles. 20:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Cool Cat Civility, AGF violations, accusations of sockpuppetry and more. --M 18:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Diyako Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. Cool Cat 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Heja helweda Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. Cool Cat 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Muhamed Civility and pov concerns on a number of articles. Systematic bias may also be observed. Cool Cat 00:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Rydel for excessive Personal insults in my direction, lack of wikiettiquette (title one contributor) and on Belarusian language which was reverted back and forth over 50 times since December, and was locked twice as a result. Rydel refused any discussions or medition proposals.--Kuban Cossack 18:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Williamo1 Continued placement of POV material on page Hyper-Calvinism. 17:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Jersey Devil: Has afd'd over 35 articles in 2 weeks, all created by me.--Striver 00:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Siddiqui : This user has been unilaterally editing sensitive history related articles to conform to his POV.
• Prasi90 – vandalism, trolling and personal attacks; reoffending after several blocks. haz _(user talk) 20:09, 14 March 2006
• Colignatus -- Colignatus is editing articles related to voting systems to express his original research and his opinions, and retaliates against editors who revert or question his contributions with personal attacks, personal threats, and requests for payment for wasting his time. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 05:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Aucaman Chronic violator of the 3rr, engages in personal attacks (WP:NPA), ignores consensus (WP:CON), possibly part of a Zionist movement, hijacks one or two pages by repeatedly reverting, using banners and excessive texts in the discussion page, incivil behavior (WP:CIVIL), gaming the system (WP:POINT), assuming bad faith(WP:AGF), harassment (WP:STALK), and engages in personal attacks (WP:NPA).
• hakozen – keeps changing the article on the Huns to claim they were Turkic, even though we've worked hard to make this page show all sides of the issue; the exact ethnic identity of the Huns is disputed, and we want the page to reflect that. Nonetheless, Hakozen keeps changing all NPOV mentions of "uncertain" etc. to "Turkic" and no longer participates on the Talk page. After I contacted him on his user page, he claimed I and the other level-headed editors were anti-Turk racists serving Greek and Armenian masters. CRCulver 01:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• FourthAve Many violations of WP:NPA He has received three formal warnings, several informal warnings but continues to attack. Edits include obscenity and vandalism. Revision by other editors of vandalism and POV posts are met with bad-faith accusations.
• Happyjoe and associated sockpuppets Insistence on adding this unsourced POV edit despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Young Zaphod – multiple violations of WP:SOCK on multiple vote pages; violations of WP:3RR; problems with WP:NOR. Karnesky 12:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Licorne - accused of persistent and constant POV pushing, personal attacks, and original research. --Fastfission 17:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• 205.240.227.15 Repeated pov vandal. Has been blocked several times. Problems ranging from WP:NPOV to WP:3RR. Athough there has been problems with personal attacks, they are not (so far) part of this RFC, simply due to the shear amount of article-related problems.--Colle|File:Locatecolle.gif|Talk-- 00:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Mr j galt – - Problems with WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:NOR, and gaming of WP:3RR, etc. After conducting a multi-front revert war on the Plame affair, Larry Johnson (political commentator), and Valerie Plame articles that drove all three into protection, the user then extended his attempt to about a dozen articles related to the Plame matter, repeating the very same kinds of edits in order to cast erroneous doubt on the established facts of the case. Any editor challenging him is inevitably accused by Mr j galt of whatever it is he himself has been accused, in a classic Troll style. 22:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• 65.182.172.x – NOTE: The IP 65.182.172.87 has been blocked for one month as of February 6, 2006. User shows repeated pattern of violating WP:AGF, WP:NPA, and Misplaced Pages:Harassment with talk page comments. Has repeatedly posted personally identifying information about Misplaced Pages editors despite having been told not to. - AdelaMae 12:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/United States Congress, POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. Elle _{vécut heureuse} (Be eudaimonic!) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Sarcelles: Mainly WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:V. He has forced at least three Wikipedians to chase after every single one of his edits since April 2005. This has got to stop. -- ran (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

• Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example admin - Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

• Ixfd64 - reversing username blocks set by other administrators, with no prior discussion. 14:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Ta bu shi da yu (2) – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• February userbox deletion – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire.
• Snowspinner (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies

List newer entries on top