Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TenPoundHammer (talk | contribs) at 20:05, 24 April 2012 (→Sharon Davis (disambiguation): r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sharon Davis (disambiguation)

Sharon Davis (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as an unnecessary disambiguation page. There is only one Sharon Davis with an article and a "not to be confused with" hatnote should suffice in case someone wants to find the Shar(r)on Davies'. Tavix |  Talk  19:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Keep Four valid entries (per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION, two very valid see alsos, easily misspelt as Sharon Davis - clearly not a case for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

• Delete with haste. This disambiguates nothing. If you have one blue link and three reds, what does it navigate? NOTHING. This should not exist until at least one other redlink is made blue; currently it's putting the cart before the horse. Ten Pound Hammer • 19:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

• Comment Have you looked at the guidelines? See MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

• It still looks stupid and pointless to have only one blue link on a dab page since you're pointing people to nowhere. Why not kill it until after the other people have their own articles? Ten Pound Hammer • 20:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep as per MOS:DABMENTION the 3 red-links are perfectly valid. I think the red-links themselves should possibly be removed so it fits in with one link per line. GimliDotNet 19:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic)
• AfD debates