This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zleitzen (talk | contribs) at 04:30, 18 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:30, 18 April 2006 by Zleitzen (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please note I am not an Administrator and don't wish to be one.
I do not respond to anonymous comments.
I do not edit articles on currently serving Australian politicians.
All photos taken by me are tagged accordingly. Other photos uploaded by me in the past may be deleted.
RE: Family Trees
Thnks for your message! --JoeWorkMail 14:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Scott Grayban 14:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
I didn't mean to vadalize your page. You see you had put ]] behind Cambodia and thought it was a mistake and edited it. Since you though I was a vandal, I have changed my article. Somehow my old account was deleted and so I decided to make a new one, since I wanted credit for my edits. I teribbly sorry offending you. Also since this was on Cambodian/Thai new year, Happy cambodian/Thai new year.
Personal attacks
Seeing that you have already been blocked for making personal attacks, this warning regards your edits to User:Sgrayban on Talk:Cuba: Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Kilo-Lima| 16:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Cuba
Hi Adam. I appreciate your piece on the Cuba page. I'm replying here to get away from the noise of the talk page. Although I disagree somewhat with the characterisation of other editors, you did appear to be supporting mediation on the matter and provided a good source when requested. I noticed you had a look at the EU report and agreed with me that it was accurate. Would you support an article that had that tone, using similar terminology? Also would you have any opposition to a formal mediator taking a look at this dispute? --Zleitzen 03:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)