This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GA bot (talk | contribs) at 22:11, 16 May 2012 (Transcluding GA review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:11, 16 May 2012 by GA bot (talk | contribs) (Transcluding GA review)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Kenneth Michael Trentadue is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by MothballX (talk) at 21:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
A fact from Kenneth Michael Trentadue appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,008 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Additions to the lede
I recently removed new additions to the lede by User:MothballX. For two reasons: 1) because they essentially recapitulated information found elsewhere in the article, and, perhaps more importantly, 2) because it is speculation. The article talks about the speculation and theorizing regarding the circumstances around Trentadue's death, but it's just that: unsupported conspiracy theorizing. Not that I think it has no place in the article! But I think in general it is best to cleave to WP:LEDE, and let the facts speak for themselves. The lede should represent factual, verifiable information. Ford MF (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- According to WP:LEDE the lede is supposed to establish notability and provide a brief summary of the main points in the article. Prior to my additions it accomplished neither of these goals, now it does both. I have kept the intro NPOV. Everything I added to the introduction is supported by sources. Nothing there specifically says there was a conspiracy, just that some people believe there was and use the two other suicides as evidence of this. --MothballX (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kenneth Michael Trentadue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hghyux (talk · contribs) 22:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Checklist 1
- Not an obvious fail. ✗ Fail Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Result
N Failed per WP:SNOW. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Summary
I ask that the nominator please read the good article criteria. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories: