This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 108.0.129.33 (talk) at 08:37, 4 July 2012 (→Infrastructural characteristics: Added LAX). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:37, 4 July 2012 by 108.0.129.33 (talk) (→Infrastructural characteristics: Added LAX)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)"World city" redirects here. For other uses, see World city (disambiguation).
A global city (also called world city or sometimes alpha city or world center) is a city generally considered to be an important node in the global economic system. The concept comes from geography and urban studies and rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated, and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade.
The most complex of these entities is the global city, whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means. The use of global city, as opposed to megacity, was popularized by sociologist Saskia Sassen in her 1991 work, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo though the term world city to describe cities that control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least the May 1886 description of Liverpool by the Illustrated London News. Patrick Geddes also used the term world city later in 1915. Cities can fall from such categorization, as in the case of cities that have become less cosmopolitan and less internationally renowned in the current era, e.g., Alexandria, Egypt; Coimbra, Portugal; and Thessaloniki, Greece.
Criteria
Global city status is considered to be beneficial and desired, and because of this many groups have tried to classify and rank which cities are seen as world cities or non-world cities. Although there is a consensus upon leading world cities, the criteria upon which a classification is made can affect which other cities are included. The criteria for identification tend either to be based on a yardstick value (e.g., if the producer-service sector is the largest sector then city X is a world city) or on an imminent determination (if the producer-service sector of city X is greater than the combined producer-service sectors of N other cities then city X is a world city.)
Economic characteristics
- Serve as the corporate headquarter sites for multinational corporations, international financial institutions, law firms, conglomerates, and stock exchanges that influence the world economy
- Contribute significant financial capacity/output to the city's, region's, or even nation's GDP
- House the major stock market indices/market capitalisation
- Provide a variety of international financial services, notably in the FIRE industries, banking, accountancy, and marketing
- Appear near the top of cost of living lists and have significant agglomerations of personal wealth, e.g. in the number of billionaires residing within the city
Political characteristics
- Active influence on and participation in international events and world affairs; for example, Beijing, Berlin, London, Moscow, New Delhi, Paris, Tokyo, and Washington are capitals of influential nations.
- Hosting headquarters for international organizations such as the World Bank, NATO, or the UN.
- A large proper, population of the municipality (the centre of a metropolitan area, typically several million) or agglomeration
- Diverse demographic constituencies based on various indicators: population, habitat, mobility, and urbanisation
- Quality of life standards or city development
- Expatriate communities
Cultural characteristics
- International, first-name familiarity. Cities such as New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Tokyo, Mumbai, Paris, Berlin and London are commonly referred to without needing to specify their country.
- Renowned cultural institutions (often with high endowments), such as notable museums and galleries, notable opera, major ballet companies, orchestras, notable film centres and theatre centres. A lively cultural scene, including film festivals (such as the Toronto International Film Festival), premieres, a thriving music scene, nightlife, an opera company, art galleries, street performers, and annual parades.
- Several influential media outlets with an international reach, such as the BBC, Thompson Reuters, The New York Times, or Agence France-Presse.
- A strong sporting community, including major sports facilities, home teams in major league sports, and the ability and historical experience to host international sporting events such as the Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, or Grand Slam tennis events.
- Educational institutions; e.g., renowned universities, international student attendance, research facilities
- Sites of pilgrimage for world religions (for example, Mecca, Jerusalem or Rome)
- Cities containing World Heritage Sites of historical and cultural significance
- Tourism throughout
- City as site or subject in arts and media, television, film, video games, music, literature, magazines, articles, documentary
- City as an often repeated historic reference, showcase, or symbolic actions
Infrastructural characteristics
- An advanced transportation system that includes several highways and/or a large mass transit network offering multiple modes of transportation (rapid transit, light rail, regional rail, ferry, or bus), for example, the London Underground or the Tokyo Metro.
- Extensive and popular mass transit systems, prominent rail usage, road vehicle usage, major seaports
- A major international airport that serves as an established hub for several international airlines, for example, London Heathrow, Los Angeles International, Atlanta, Tokyo, and Chicago O'Hare. Airports with significant passenger traffic and international passengers traffic or cargo movements.
- An advanced communications infrastructure on which modern trans-national corporations rely, such as fiberoptics, Wi-Fi networks, cellular phone services, and other high-speed lines of communications. For example, Seoul and Tokyo are known as the digital and technology capitals of the world.
- Health facilities; e.g., hospitals, medical laboratories
- Prominent skylines/skyscrapers (for example Chicago, Hong Kong, New York, Sao Paulo or Tokyo)
- Cities' telephone and mail services, airport flights-range, traffic congestion, availability of water, train facilities, nearby parks, hospitals, libraries, police stations, etc.
Studies
GaWC studies
The first attempt to define, categorize, and rank global cities using 'relational data' was made in 1998 by Jon Beaverstock, Richard G Smith and Peter J. Taylor, who all worked at that time at Loughborough University in the United Kingdom, and further by academic researchers like Ronald Daus in Germany (Free University of Berlin), who focused on «extra-European cities, predominantly in the Southern hemisphere». Together, Beaverstock, Smith and Taylor established the Globalization and World Cities Research Network. A roster of world cities was outlined in the GaWC Research Bulletin 5 and ranked cities based on their connectivity through four "advanced producer services": accountancy, advertising, banking/finance, and law. The GaWC inventory identifies three levels of global cities and several sub-ranks.
The 2004 rankings acknowledged several new indicators while continuing to rank city economics more heavily than political or cultural factors. The 2008 roster, similar to the 1998 version, is sorted into categories of "Alpha" world cities (with four sub-categories), "Beta" world cities (three sub-categories), "Gamma" world cities (three sub-categories), and additional cities with "High sufficiency" or "Sufficiency" world city presence.
The 2010 roster of leading Alpha, Beta and Gamma world cities is as follows:
A map showing the distribution of GaWC-ranked world cities (2010 data).Category | Cities |
---|---|
Alpha++ | |
Alpha+ | |
Alpha | |
Alpha− |
Category | Cities |
---|---|
Beta+ | |
Beta | |
Beta− |
Category | Cities |
---|---|
Gamma+ | |
Gamma | |
Gamma− |
Global Cities Index
In 2008, the American journal Foreign Policy, in conjunction with consulting firm A.T. Kearney and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, published a ranking of global cities, based on consultation with Saskia Sassen, Witold Rybczynski, and others. Foreign Policy noted that "the world’s biggest, most interconnected cities help set global agendas, weather transnational dangers, and serve as the hubs of global integration. They are the engines of growth for their countries and the gateways to the resources of their regions."
In 2012 the index was updated.
#3 Paris#4 Tokyo#5 Hong Kong#6 Los Angeles#7 Chicago#8 Seoul#9 Brussels
#10 Washington, D.C.class=notpageimage| Top ten global cities
Rank | Change | City | Rating |
1 | New York City | 6.35 | |
2 | London | 5.79 | |
3 | 1 | Paris | 5.48 |
4 | 1 | Tokyo | 4.99 |
5 | Hong Kong | 4.56 | |
6 | 1 | Los Angeles | 3.94 |
7 | 1 | Chicago | 3.66 |
8 | 2 | Seoul | 3.41 |
9 | 2 | Brussels | 3.33 |
10 | 3 | Washington, D.C. | 3.22 |
11 | 3 | Singapore | 3.20 |
12 | 3 | Sydney | 3.13 |
13 | 5 | Vienna | 3.11 |
14 | 1 | Beijing | 3.05 |
15 | 4 | Boston | 2.94 |
16 | 2 | Toronto | 2.92 |
17 | 5 | San Francisco | 2.89 |
18 | 1 | Madrid | 2.80 |
19 | 6 | Moscow | 2.77 |
20 | 4 | Berlin | 2.76 |
21 | Shanghai | 2.73 | |
22 | Buenos Aires | 2.71 | |
23 | 3 | Frankfurt | 2.69 |
24 | 2 | Barcelona | 2.59 |
25 | 1 | Zurich | 2.53 |
Rank | Change | City | Rating |
26 | 3 | Amsterdam | 2.45 |
27 | 4 | Stockholm | 2.43 |
28 | Rome | 2.36 | |
29 | 2 | Dubai | 2.32 |
30 | 1 | Montreal | 2.32 |
31 | 2 | Munich | 2.31 |
32 | NA | Melbourne | 2.25 |
33 | 2 | São Paulo | 2.19 |
34 | 4 | Mexico City | 2.18 |
35 | 3 | Geneva | 2.13 |
36 | 2 | Miami | 2.13 |
37 | 4 | Istanbul | 2.10 |
38 | Houston | 2.08 | |
39 | 1 | Atlanta | 2.06 |
40 | 1 | Taipei | 2.05 |
41 | 1 | Milan | 2.01 |
42 | 5 | Copenhagen | 1.99 |
43 | 7 | Bangkok | 1.93 |
44 | Dublin | 1.82 | |
45 | 1 | Mumbai | 1.79 |
46 | 4 | Tel Aviv | 1.69 |
47 | Osaka | 1.57 | |
48 | 3 | New Delhi | 1.55 |
49 | 1 | Kuala Lumpur | 1.49 |
50 | 7 | Cairo | 1.49 |
Rank | Change | City | Rating |
51 | Manila | 1.49 | |
52 | Johannesburg | 1.48 | |
53 | 4 | Rio de Janeiro | 1.31 |
54 | 1 | Jakarta | 1.30 |
55 | 1 | Bogota | 1.17 |
56 | Nairobi | 0.98 | |
57 | 2 | Caracas | 0.89 |
58 | Bangalore | 0.85 | |
59 | Lagos | 0.84 | |
60 | 3 | Guangzhou | 0.82 |
61 | Ho Chi Minh City | 0.72 | |
62 | 2 | Karachi | 0.66 |
63 | 1 | Dhaka | 0.65 |
64 | 1 | Kolkata | 0.63 |
65 | 3 | Shenzhen | 0.62 |
66 | 1 | Chongqing | 0.25 |
Global City Competitiveness Index
In 2012, Economist Intelligence Unit ranked the competitiveness of global cities according to their demonstrated ability to attract capital, businesses, talent and visitors.
Rank | City | Score |
---|---|---|
1 | New York City | 71.4 |
2 | London | 70.4 |
3 | Singapore | 70.0 |
4 | Hong Kong | 69.3 |
4 | Paris | 69.3 |
6 | Tokyo | 68.0 |
7 | Zurich | 66.8 |
8 | Washington, D.C. | 66.1 |
9 | Chicago | 65.9 |
10 | Boston | 64.5 |
11 | Frankfurt | 64.1 |
12 | Toronto | 63.9 |
13 | Geneva | 63.3 |
13 | San Francisco | 63.3 |
15 | Sydney | 63.1 |
16 | Melbourne | 62.7 |
17 | Amsterdam | 62.4 |
18 | Vancouver | 61.8 |
19 | Los Angeles | 61.5 |
20 | Seoul | 60.5 |
20 | Stockholm | 60.5 |
22 | Montreal | 60.3 |
23 | Copenhagen | 59.9 |
23 | Houston | 59.9 |
25 | Dallas | 59.8 |
25 | Vienna | 59.8 |
27 | Dublin | 59.5 |
28 | Madrid | 59.4 |
29 | Seattle | 59.3 |
30 | Philadelphia | 58.5 |
31 | Atlanta | 58.2 |
31 | Berlin | 58.2 |
33 | Oslo | 57.2 |
34 | Brussels | 57.1 |
35 | Hamburg | 56.8 |
36 | Auckland | 56.7 |
37 | Birmingham | 56.6 |
37 | Taipei | 56.6 |
39 | Beijing | 56.0 |
40 | Dubai | 55.9 |
Rank | City | Score |
---|---|---|
41 | Abu Dhabi | 55.8 |
41 | Barcelona | 55.8 |
43 | Miami | 55.2 |
43 | Shanghai | 55.2 |
45 | Kuala Lumpur | 55.0 |
46 | Prague | 53.7 |
47 | Doha | 52.9 |
47 | Milan | 52.9 |
47 | Osaka | 52.9 |
50 | Nagoya | 52.3 |
50 | Rome | 52.3 |
52 | Shenzhen | 51.7 |
53 | Warsaw | 51.3 |
54 | Monaco | 51.0 |
55 | Budapest | 50.4 |
56 | Incheon | 50.2 |
57 | Lisbon | 49.5 |
58 | Moscow | 49.4 |
59 | Tel Aviv | 49.3 |
60 | Buenos Aires | 49.2 |
61 | Bangkok | 49.0 |
62 | São Paulo | 48.3 |
63 | Fukuoka | 47.7 |
64 | Busan | 47.4 |
64 | Guangzhou | 47.4 |
66 | Kraków | 47.3 |
67 | Johannesburg | 47.1 |
68 | Delhi | 46.7 |
68 | Santiago | 46.7 |
70 | Mumbai | 46.6 |
71 | Mexico City | 46.2 |
72 | Athens | 46.1 |
73 | Cape Town | 45.9 |
74 | Istanbul | 45.5 |
75 | Tianjin | 45.4 |
76 | Bucharest | 44.9 |
76 | Rio de Janeiro | 44.9 |
78 | Panama City | 44.8 |
79 | Bangalore | 44.6 |
80 | Kuwait City | 44.2 |
Rank | City | Score |
---|---|---|
81 | Jakarta | 44.1 |
82 | Dalian | 44.0 |
83 | Chengdu | 43.5 |
84 | Suzhou | 43.4 |
85 | Manila | 43.2 |
86 | Muscat | 43.0 |
87 | Chongqing | 42.9 |
88 | Lima | 42.5 |
89 | Bogotá | 42.3 |
90 | Monterrey | 42.2 |
91 | Qingdao | 42.1 |
92 | Ahmedabad | 41.9 |
93 | Hangzhou | 41.6 |
94 | Durban | 41.2 |
95 | Ankara | 40.9 |
96 | Medellín | 40.0 |
97 | Pune | 39.8 |
98 | Belo Horizonte | 39.4 |
98 | Hyderabad | 39.4 |
100 | Almaty | 39.3 |
100 | Saint Petersburg | 39.3 |
102 | Guadalajara | 39.0 |
102 | Porto Alegre | 39.0 |
104 | Hanoi | 38.8 |
105 | Chennai | 38.1 |
106 | Kolkata | 37.8 |
106 | Riyadh | 37.8 |
108 | Kiev | 36.9 |
109 | Ho Chi Minh City | 36.5 |
110 | Surabaya | 35.9 |
111 | Colombo | 35.6 |
112 | Karachi | 35.5 |
113 | Cairo | 35.0 |
114 | Bandung | 34.8 |
115 | Nairobi | 34.6 |
116 | Alexandria | 31.8 |
117 | Beirut | 30.6 |
118 | Dhaka | 27.7 |
119 | Lagos | 27.6 |
120 | Tehran | 27.2 |
Global Power City Index
The Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation in Tokyo, Japan issued a comprehensive study of global cities in 2011. The ranking is based on six overall categories, "Economy", "Research & Development", "Cultural Interaction", "Livability", "Environment", and "Accessibility", with 69 individual indicators among them. This Japanese ranking also breaks down top ten world cities ranked in subjective categories such as "manager, researcher, artist, visitor and resident."
Rank | City | Score | Best category (position) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | New York City | 320.9 | Research & Development (1.) |
2 | London | 320.6 | Cultural Interaction (1.) |
3 | Paris | 308.7 | Accessibility (1.) Livability (1.) |
4 | Tokyo | 304.3 | Economy (1.) |
5 | Singapore | 255.3 | Cultural Interaction (4.) |
6 | Berlin | 234.8 | Environment (4.) |
7 | Seoul | 233.4 | Research & Development (5.) |
8 | Hong Kong | 231.1 | Economy (6.) Cultural Interaction (6.) |
9 | Amsterdam | 226.6 | Accessibility (5.) |
10 | Frankfurt | 225.1 | Environment (3.) |
11 | Sydney | 215.8 | Cultural Interaction (11.) |
12 | Vienna | 215.3 | Environment (5.) |
13 | Los Angeles | 212.2 | Research & Development (6.) |
14 | Zurich | 211.4 | Environment (2.) |
15 | Osaka | 205.8 | Livability (3.) |
16 | Boston | 205.7 | Research & Development (3.) |
17 | Geneva | 205.2 | Environment (1.) |
18 | Beijing | 204.2 | Economy (3.) |
19 | Copenhagen | 203.2 | Environment (10.) |
20 | Madrid | 202.8 | Livability (8.) |
21 | San Francisco | 201.5 | Research & Development (10.) |
22 | Vancouver | 201.3 | Livability (2.) |
23 | Shanghai | 199.3 | Economy (8.) |
24 | Brussels | 199.2 | Accessibility (13.) |
25 | Toronto | 194.6 | Research & Development (15.) |
World City Survey
In 2010 the London based estate agent Knight Frank LLP together with the Citibank published a survey of world cities. The Wealth Report 2010, which includes the World City Survey, assesses four parameters — economic activity, political power, knowledge and influence, and quality of life. The list aimed to rank the world's 40 most influential cities. New York tops the list in Economic activity, political power and knowledge and Paris tops it in quality of life. London and Paris get the same aggregate ranking of 149, making them de facto world's 2nd and 3rd most prominent cities. In 2011, the list was updated, and the top 20 cities ranked are:
Rank | City | Best category |
---|---|---|
1 | New York City | Economic activity |
2 | London | Economic activity |
2 | Paris | Quality of life |
4 | Tokyo | Economic activity |
5 | Brussels | Political power |
6 | Los Angeles | Knowledge and influence |
7 | Singapore | Economic activity |
8 | Beijing | Political power |
9 | Toronto | Quality of life |
10 | Berlin | Quality of life |
11 | Chicago | Knowledge and influence |
12 | Washington, D.C. | Political power |
13 | Seoul | Economic activity |
14 | Frankfurt | Quality of life |
15 | Sydney | Knowledge and influence |
16 | San Francisco | Knowledge and influence |
17 | Hong Kong | Economic activity |
18 | Shanghai | Economic activity |
19 | Mexico City | Political power |
20 | Bangkok | Political power |
Company location survey
Cities ranked by category
See also
- Metropolis
- Megalopolis (city type)
- List of cities by GDP
- Primate city
- Financial centre
- Ecumenopolis
- Ranally city rating system
- Index of urban studies articles
References
- Sassen, Saskia - The global city: strategic site/new frontier
- Sassen, Saskia - The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. (1991) - Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07063-6
- "UK History". History.ac.uk. 18 December 2009. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- ^ Doel, M. & Hubbard, P., (2002), "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows", City, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 351-368. Subscription required
- ^ GaWC Research Bulletin 5, GaWC, Loughborough University, 28 July 1999
- Template:PDFlink, "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998.
- Global Urban Indicators Database 2 (1998 data) (data sets in .ZIP), UN-HABITAT
- World Indices, Bloomberg
- J.V. Beaverstock, World City Networks 'From Below', GaWC, Loughborough University, 29 September 2010
- ^ Worldwide Cost of Living survey 2011 - City rankings, Mercer, 12 July 2011
- ^ Moscow Leads Cities With Most Billionaires, Forbes, 17 May 2011
- Template:PDFlink, "2004 Human Development Report" (page 99), UNDP, 2004
- Template:PDFlink, "World Resources 1998-99", WRI, 1998
- City Profiles, UN
- Template:PDFlink, WBCSD
- Template:PDFlink, UN, 2004
- World-wide quality of living survey, Mercer, 10 April 2006
- Template:PDFlink, "THE STATE OF THE WORLD'S CITIES REPORT 2001", UN-HABITAT, 21 June 2006
- P. De Groote, Economic and Tourism Aspects of the Olympic Games, GaWC, Loughborough University, 21 September 2005
- Template:PDFlink (registration required)
- K. O'Connor, International Students and Global Cities, GaWC, Loughborough University, 17 February 2005
- World Heritage List, UNESCO
- "Estimated Ridership of the World's Largest Public Transit Systems, 1998". People.hofstra.edu. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Template:PDFlink, October 2003
- "Traffic Intensity by International Urban Area: 1990". Publicpurpose.com. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Largest seaports of the world
- Mapping the Global Network Economy on the Basis of Air Passenger Transport Flows, GaWC, Loughborough University, 8 December 2004
- "The World's Best Skylines". Homepages.ipact.nl. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Global Cities in Informational Societies – Article at the University of Brasilia, UNESCO doc.
- "The World According to GaWC 2010". Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Study Group and Network. Loughborough University. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
- "The 2008 Global Cities Index". Foreign Policy (November/December 2008). 21 October 2008. Retrieved 31 October 2008.
- "2012 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook" (PDF). Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- "The Global City Competitiveness Index". Managementthinking.eiu.com. 12 March 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
-
"Global Power City Index 2010" (PDF). Tokyo, Japan: Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation. October, 2010. Retrieved 2012-02-26.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - The Wealth Report 2010, Knightfrank.com, 25. March 2010
- "Revealed: Cities that rule the world". CNN. 10 April 2010.
- "The Wealth Report 2011" (PDF). Knight Frank LLP.
- "Cities: largest (without surrounding suburban areas)". Geohive. Retrieved 3 August 2011.
- R.L. Forstall, R.P. Greene, and J.B. Pick, "Which are the largest? Why published populations for major world urban areas vary so greatly", City Futures Conference, (University of Illinois at Chicago, July 2004) – Table 5 (p.34)
- "Global City Migration Map". Migrationinformation.org. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "UK Economic Outlook, March 2007", page 5. "Table 1.2 – Top 30 urban agglomeration GDP rankings in 2005 and illustrative projections to 2020 (using UN definitions and population estimates)". Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
External links
- Repository of Links Relating to Urban Places
- World Cities article by Jennifer Curtis of Charles Sturt University
- The World-System’s City System: A Research Agenda by Jeffrey Kentor and Michael Timberlake of the University of Utah and David Smith of University of California, Irvine
- The State of the World's Cities, 2001, UN Human Settlements Programme
- "U.S. Cities in the 'World City Network'", by Peter J. Taylor and Robert E. Lang, February 2005 (Full Report in PDF)