Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs) at 18:26, 4 July 2012 (→AE: Re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

All good

No problem mate, yeah absolutely excited for Vic's fight, with Alvarez-Cintron, Wlodarczyk-Green, Darchinyan-Moreno, Agbeko-Mares 2, Cotto-Margarito 2, Klitschko-Mormeck and Froch-Ward comming up, i can't remember a end of year program being topped off with so many consistently good fights on a weekly basis, soooo pumped!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 01:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Alvarez by TKO I'm really getting the bandwagon with him since his last few fights, Green by decision in a epic war. Darchinyan by a wide points decision, as good as Moreno is, he's struggled with Monshipour and Cermeno so i figure Vic can go one better than them. Mares all the way, Agbeko is tuff but i get a feeling Mares is on the way up and Agbeko is one the way out. I'm pulling for Cotto but i'm worried me may not be able to hold off Margarito's aggression, if he boxes a disciplined fight and only occasional exchanges with him, then he can get revenge. Klitschko maybe gets easiest win of the last 5 years. And Froch-Ward, i keep going back and forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 03:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

== Slight mistake with evander's reign Evander's longest reign (3 years) was actually his 3rd reign. For that title reign he just had wba, ibf, ring, He had the wbc in his first heavyweight reign, If we applied former titles for multiple reigns the table would be a giant unreadable mess. I could put former ibf if that's puts a but more clarity, no hard feelings, just following the way the table was created. god bless — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 02:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Tommy Gunn, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 22:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to replace it with blank content, I was trying to make the article about the actual fictional character Tommy Gunn so it didn't have to redirect to Rocky V. Can I still do that? I won't accidently erase the page this time. Sorry about that. TheShadowCrow (talk) 22:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Vanes Martirosyan, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Alexander Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Khoren Gevor, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Ian McLeod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Assistance

Hey, can you please delete this:Talk:Tube worm (body plan)? thanks. --109.232.72.49 (talk) 21:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Artur Grigorian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Artyom Hovanessyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glendale, Var, Montebello, Woodland Hills, Civic Auditorium (<- Check disam. later) and Nokia Theater

Vanes Martirosyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amir Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cocoaguy ここがいい 21:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James J. Jeffries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jim Corbett and The Arena

Randy Turpin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Leamington

Sam Langford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tommy Burns

Vanes Martirosyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Juan Diaz

Vic Darchinyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

a note

Please refrain from personal attacks even if the other user is blocked and causing trouble.]. If you can't keep your cool, wait for others to revert for what on the face on it are often style changes, avoiding thus the impression that you're personally out to enforce them. Just an example: Here, you're just reverting thus defending a fluffy and poorly sourced statement with an inappropriate edit summery. Thanks.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't think I'm being tricked. He has been edit warring and harassing you so he stays rightly indefinitely blocked and may indeed be banned permanently if they don't sop socking. I spent also part of my my time here assuring that. Please check out the relevant terms as you're confusing them. I was just curious if I see a glimmer of reason on their side.

Anyways and regardless of the quality of your contributions that I do not want to evaluate, but which we certainly don't measure byte by byte, if they're good others will agree. But your rights to edit do not include that to personal attacks in edit summaries. In short, my post above was referring only to you and only for you as I expect you to do better. The next content or style dispute will come up, some troll will show up or find an free IP or open proxy etc.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Juan Manuel Márquez. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. This also applies to comments in the article edit summary. Zarcadia (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Marvelous Marvin Hagler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gegard Mousasi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Caps

Many edits by UkBoxen change caps in Super Middleweight, etc. I understand that the weight categories should be lowcase, but titles might be capped (?). Is there a guideline on that? Can you link it please? (this will save time later - sorry for asking, overload). Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Jimmy Wilde

If an article is European we use European dates, 8 February 2012; not February 8, 1912. Thanks. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Arturo Gatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rocky Marciano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colima, Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Misplaced Pages (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Kelly 02:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Archie Moore, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You were told before that adding flags to acticles is a violation of MOS:FLAG. Arguing that they exist in other pages is not a justification to violate the MOS. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Jean Pascal. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Warned previously because of the same. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

No personal attacks

Hey,

I came to thank you for your valuable edits to Vitali Klitschko. And also to remind you that you must avoid any personal attacks on fellow users - such as the unexcusable summary to your recent edit. Happy edits, Ukrained (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I am doing nothing wrong. I am just reverting a vandal's work. He is swearing at me and I haven't back. You should be telling me this and banning him. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

In fact, you're doing everything wrong. You're eagerly returning insults. And, by doing this, you are exaggerating suspicions that your referenced edits are not that neutral;) which I believe are. As for the other guy, he's going to be blocked in a matter of hours as a personal-attacking anon. The only question is: will YOU be as well? Stay cool, Ukrained (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

On a somewhat related note, I've issued a rangeblock against that the editor said comment was directed at. They're evading a block on an account on a number of IP addresses, so hopefully this will at least slow them down a bit. Hersfold 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Flag Icons

Hi. Could you please read;

• policy on assuming good faith and why you shouldn't describe edits as vandalism, simply because you don't like them.
• guidelines on the use of icons as decoration and use of flags for no good reason.

Then, if you have any thoughts on my edits you can address them constructively and from an informed position. Thanks. --Escape Orbit 23:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I see that your use of flags has already been pointed out to you as being in violation of the manual of style. Perhaps you could explain why it doesn't apply in these cases? --Escape Orbit 23:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The problem with the flags is that they are distractive icons that shouldn't be used. Of course people will recognize the Flag of the US or Canada, but would you recognize or ? The flags are unneeded nationalisms that were forbidden from many infoboxes, and at the Infobox boxer or MMA event should apply as well. The "other article has it" argument is vague, it is in another article because somebody believe that it was correct as s/he saw it in another article. A common example is the "see release history" link that appears in many musical-related articles. WP:IBX states that these internal links shouldn't be used as the WP:TOC exists. The real thing to do is reach a consensus to remove all flags from infoboxes, as boxers aren't national teams or countries, where the flags are more relevant. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

It is not that bad. but neither that OK. The real place where you should be discussing this is either WT:MOS or Template talk:Infobox boxer. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring adn attacks

You've been warned above again on personal attacks but you also need to refrain form edit warring: An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Ukboxen edits are not exempt because they are not banned but blocked indefinitely and you still revert before accounts are blocked and tagged accordingly. I think I asked you to review WP:BLOCK, WP:BAN and WP:3rr in the past, in any case do so now.

The exceptions would be actions performed by banned users, their sockpuppets and by tagged sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked. This needs to be interpreted in your case narrowly as you feed the fire with your own attacks, underline repeatedly that you haven't been blocked yet and revert other users as well. Here you revert as with the exception of the flagicon....

In other word, you should not claim exceptions from the three revert rule unless a third party has tagged that account, in which case they will often block and revert. If you continue to do multiple reverts yourself or leash out with attacks before reporting the issue to the relevant boards, you are part of the problem and next time you'll be blocked.

A lot of activity has been gone into keeping that guy off the pages and your back, and I understand that it is frustrating but the page histories for some boxers are now a disgrace, so yes, this is a final warning for you: Do not edit war, do not issue any other attack. Don't even call content edits by a blocked user vandalism. If you can't do that move them from your watch list. Thanks --Tikiwont (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Juan Manuel Márquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dariusz Michalczewski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Halle and Altona

Joe Calzaghe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Romanian and Ricardo López

Carlos Monzón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Colombians

James J. Corbett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spartans

Karo Parisyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Denny

Winky Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Puerto Ricans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Lennox Lewis

Greetings,

Please discuss the links you added at Talk:Lennox_Lewis#Overlinking.

Also, regarding your edit summary: don't call people names and make accusinations. Please read WP:FAITH and assume of good faith.--Jahalive (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Only warning

If you keep violating policy as you did with these changes to Joe Calzaghe it's next stop ANI for you. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 13:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

The Klitschko's

Well, Vitali is gonna retire this year, so i only think he has one or two fights left. So I dont see the sense in making sections all the time. His career is ending soon, so i think it is right to make a final section, just like on Mike Tyson's & and Lennox Lewis' articles.

IF Wladimir wins the WBC, then I agree we have to make an new section called Unidsputed Heavyweight Champion. But his fights in 2012 are not going to be any significant. Fight against Mormeck, rematch vs. Tony Thompsons and then maybe Arreola?. Well I think it is best it just called After Haye. Because it really tells what happened after his fight with Haye.

Cheers David-golota David-golota (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Well yeah, but just because other P4p boxers have many more sections, dosent make the article look better, only worse.

Look at Mike Tyson article. He dosent have so many articles and is clearly the most infamous boxer ever.

I think it only makes the articles looks worse and ugly with so many sections.

Look at the Sosnowski and Johnso sections. They are so short. It looks stupid.

David-golota (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Harut Grigorian.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Bmusician 06:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited James J. Jeffries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Brady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

Mike Tyson

The Manual of Style has guidelines against many of the links you are adding. See: WP:Overlink, specifically:"Generally, a link should appear only once in an article" and "Avoid linking the names of major ... locations."

There are also problems with link specificity (see WP:SPECIFICLINK) and unnecessary use of piped links.

Please talk about the changes you want to make and build consensus for them.--Jahalive (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Harry Greb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Highland Park, Old City Hall and Skating Rink

Pongsaklek Wonjongkam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yala, Nonthaburi and Surin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Haye

David Haye fills alot. Very much. He brought the exciment and attention back to the heavyweight divison. Media hype and all the old great stuff back. He is Wladimirs rival. And Wladimir never really had an rival like Ali or Tyson had. That is why Haye is so "important".

Cheers mate

David-golota (talk) 06:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Michael Katsidis

Could you please provide an edit summary when you've made changes? You've made a lot of minor edits to this article, but at no point have you explained what you've changed, or why. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Capitalization

Hi. With regard to the Tyson article, I wanted to ask about this sentence:

"He was the first heavyweight boxer to simultaneously hold and only Heavyweight to individually unify the WBA, WBC and IBF titles."

Why do you have one use of the word "heavyweight" in lowercase and the other capitalized in the same sentence? For a casual reader like me, this just looks odd. -- James26 (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure thing. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Andre Ward

Dear User:TheShadowCrow, please see the comments I have added on the Talk:Andre Ward page. I'm not targeting anyone's edits in particular, and certainly not yours. You are welcome to add sources to verify your assessments. But without references, it often happens that opinions and descriptive comments fall short of WP:BLP guidelines. In my view (and I'm only one person and I may be wrong) some of this page did that. Please let me quote from those guidelines:

This page in a nutshell: Material about living persons added to any Misplaced Pages page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research.

If you really want to replace all that commenary, I assure you I won't delete it again. I've never been in an edit war, and I don't want one now. I just encourage the full referencing of articles. By the way, if you were referring to my edits, I can assure you that the lineal stuff is not mine. Regards.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi again. The fact that I put "back" then lineal stuff that you hated so much does not mean that I agreed with it either. You and I are not the only editors on that page. Someone else clearly wanted to add that lineal section. As I said above, I don't intend to get into edit wars even with people who make pages worse or violate Misplaced Pages guidelines. Best wishes.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

AA2

Please be aware of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 before making further reverts. Thanks. Grandmaster 18:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

The same is for you, Grandmaster. You're an active part of that editwarring. Gazifikator (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

The next time you chose to edit war (as you have been doing at Armenians in Azerbaijan), please kindly bother to use the talkpage to discuss the issue with other editors. Communicating through edit summaries is hardly efficient. If not, I'll have to start enforcing such discussion with revert paroles and blocks. Thank you. Moreschi (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Azerbaijanis in Armenia

The information about elderly and ill people of Azeri origin living in Armenia is not something I made up. It is contained in the report of the European Country of Origin Information Network, which reference is provided in the introduction of the article. Parishan (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Dariusz Michalczewski‎

Another editor reverted your edits and made a personal attack against you. I have warned them not to do it again. --Jprg1966  15:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Juan Manuel Marquez

You are certainly welcomed to add in those statements if you have reliable sources to back them up. Please review WP:RS. Otherwise, it's just original research and POV. As a result, I have removed them. BearMan998 (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I undid your edits once again since you failed to take note of the above. I see that you made those edits prior to the below ban so I'll assume this won't happen again. If this occurs again, I won't hesitate to report this as it's now clear that your actions are not in good faith and are in clear disregard to established policy. BearMan998 (talk) 02:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Persistent violations of WP:BLP and WP:NOTAFORUM

It appears you have had many warnings for inappropriate additions to biographies of living persons (BLP) articles. Please review the Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons policy in full, which includes the clear statement that adding unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material is forbidden. This addition was inappropriate for that reason and other reasons I gave here. You have however restored the content with an inappropriate and unhelpful edit summary. I am now removing it again - any re-adding of this content or other blatant BLP policy violations will result in the blocking of this account. Consider this your final warning.

Furthermore, it appears that you have been mass creating talk page threads which are not for discussion on improving the article in violation of WP:NOTAFORUM, such as this. If you review WP:NOT you will find that Misplaced Pages is not a venue for advocacy or testing free speech. Use of Misplaced Pages in this way is disruptive editing and any further (re-)creations of such threads will also result in a block. CT Cooper · talk 20:44, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems pretty clear to me that you have ignored the warning I gave you about following WP:BLP policy when editing BLP articles, as two recent examples demonstrate well:

• Adding contentious with no attempt to source, and edit warring to retain it in the article, in itself grounds for a block. While you did eventually add a source, it was still a violation of BLP policy as poorly sourced content
• On Teimour Radjabov, you have altered content for the apparent purpose of character assassination. Using Misplaced Pages to advocate that someone is a "terrorist" or "racist" is unacceptable, potentially libellous, and violates both WP:BLP and WP:NOT. This case is aggravated by the fact you were previously warned for doing just this on Cenk Uygur, and I had to revdelete some of your comments, which should have given you the message.

Given the above edits, your earlier warnings, and the final warning above, I think it is fair to conclude that a block is needed here, therefore:

I seriously considered using WP:BLPSE to restrict your ability to edit BLP articles, but I determined that a block was sufficient for now. This will be reviewed if there any further problems after the block expires. CT Cooper · talk 18:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

WP:AE

Hi. Please be aware of this report at WP:AE: . Thanks. Grandmaster 19:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

AE

See this for the result of the AE thread. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

If you seriously can't see the problem with the now-deleted edit at Teimour Radjabov, or how it relates to AA, I feel further vindicated. And if you reread your ban, it's all articles and discussions relating to AA. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

If you want to appeal, there are instructions at the top of AE, so you can go that route if you like. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

It's in the big red header at the top, last paragraph. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Further WP:BLP violations

In less than 24 hours after the block expired, and already I am finding issues with your edits to BLPs:

• You added some content to Victor Ortiz relating to drugs without properly citing it, as far as I can see drugs is not mentioned in the source provided and there is no source for the quote either. It should have occurred to you that anything relating to drugs is contentious, and a source must be provided, particular if you include a quote.
• On Gago Drago, you added content without making any attempt to source it, despite being required by WP:BLP/WP:V. Given that this was non-contentious and there was already a lot of unsourced information, which might make it look okay, I am letting this one go.

This is the only post-block warning that you are going to receive for violations of WP:BLP policy. I will say now now that any further edits like that observed on Victor Ortiz, then I will be utilising WP:BLPSE to disallow you from editing BLPs, either indefinitely or for a significant period of time. This may or may not extend to talk pages depending on the circumstances. I am coming to the conclusion given the above and your comments at User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights that you simply don't "get it" in regards to BLP policy, and while this would be a broad ban, it would be justified.

On the AA ban you have received, I should point out that you have had more than one "offence" on these articles, with Cenk Uygur being an example. You claim it has not been clearly explained to you what rule you have broken on Teimour Radjabov. I actually gave you lengthy explanations on what you were doing wrong on that and other things, but I'm not going to spoon feed you policy - you should read the policies cited to you and from that understand what you are doing wrong. The main problem you seem to have is that you repeatedly add content and make contentious statements which is not supported by the sources, and is frequently just your own personal opinion - just reading the first few paragraph on the WP:BLP policy says not to do that, so I'm not buying that excuse and I doubt those who review any appeal will either. It is basic policy on this project that you source content (WP:V) and don't use articles to advocate your own views (WP:NOR/WP:NPOV), and these rules just become more important on BLPs. CT Cooper · talk 10:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I have responded to your reply on my talk page. CT Cooper · talk 17:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)