Misplaced Pages

WMAQ Former on air talent list

Hello TVtonighttokc

I was wondering if I could get your opinion in my favor. On the WMAQ former personalites, editors keep deleting all the names posted and I don't feel it is right. You had made some adjustments to the industry jargon on that page and I respected and agreed with your decision. I was wondering if you could write a statement in favor of the 98.223.95.42 edits posted on the village link on the discussion page. The person took a lot of time and effort into the list. We just need a few more in our favor and the edits will be reverted back to the way it should. Or if you just want to revert it back yourself. Ask any other editors you know if they could sign it too. Thanks so much--TVFAN24 (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TVFAN24 (talk • contribs)

Thank You

Hello TVtonightokc,

I just wanted to thank you again for sticking up for me on the WMAQ dispute. You know that list has been that way for a year and hasn't been reverted until now. They even accused me of making names up. I keep track of who comes and goes on stations. Please encourage other users to do as you did and write their response on that page. I feel it should be reverted back to how it was. Those people live in Canada too. They don't even know this station. Maybe you could even revert back to the last edit yourself. Thanks again. I felt like I had no one in my corner.TVFAN24 (talk) 03:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Sister, Sister (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. magnius (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Fox O&O News Theme

Articles for deletion nomination of Alive (news music)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Spirit (news music)

Articles for deletion nomination of Evolution (news music)

Re: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Disney_Channel&diff=prev&oldid=377171530

Actually, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone is the real name of the book and the film, only different in the U.S because it was felt American children wouldn't understand what the Philosopher's Stone is so in other words it's a "dumbed down" title. So please do not change the title on any Misplaced Pages page, if it is on an American article such as Disney then the Sorcerer's Stone title may be added in brackets. Jammy (talk) 17:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to WDIV-TV. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I know you've been here a long, long time, but I'm giving you a templated notice anyway. You're experienced enough to know better, so I don't see why you don't have more than 16 edit summaries in your last 500 edits. It would certainly help the rest of us know what you're doing (or attempting to do). Thanks for your consideration. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 7 Secrets

The article 7 Secrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited since creation, edit history shows subject was recently changed from a Nickelodeon program. No way to know which, if either, is the correct version. Useless article.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello Tvtonightokc, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to lists of former employees in articles, such as you did in WCBD-TV and other articles. Not including this type of material in articles abides by current consensus and is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

1. WP:NOT tells us, Misplaced Pages is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Misplaced Pages.
2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Misplaced Pages that is not verifiable and sourced.
3. WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 22:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Victorious episodes, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Confession0791 10:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

WCUU-CA: The U Too

If The U Too is to be on WCIU-DT 26.5 and WCIU-DT 26.6, isn't it also going to be on WCUU-CA Channel 48? AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Closing credits. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ckatz_spy 04:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits

Minor edits are only supposed to be used for superficial changes, with no change in content: WP:MINOR. Almost all of your edits have been marked "minor", but many of them weren't. In particular, these recent changes shouldn't have been marked as minor: ] . It's important that non-minor edits aren't marked as "minor". Thanks, and happy editing. Glaucus (talk) 00:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Merri Dee

Hi there, to get the ref tags properly working in the article you created called Merri Dee. You need to change from <refname=merri> to <ref name="merri"> Noticed there is a space between ref and name. --Visik (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

TV stations

Thanks for the tips. I want to stay current with editing and reviewing strategies for articles. Strafidlo (talk) 23:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Check out WCSC-TV as I have incorporated some of these tips. Strafidlo (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 7 Secrets

The article 7 Secrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable "series" that is just a series of promotion videos for Nickelodeon stars. Fails WP:N

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Active Banana ( 01:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Daryl Hawks

Hey TVtonightokc,

I agree with you that Hawks should be added to the former on air talent list but I removed it b/c Deconstrctthis will freak out and remove it anyway. I think me and you should write a claim to the Misplaced Pages Administators b/c too many people's names have been removed from stations and entertainment shows. This has really bothered me since this all happened last summer. It's something I really enjoyed to do and tried to be the best I could at making changes as they occured and now I don't even feel like editing anymore b/c of this. Just b/c they don't have a Wiki page, doesn't mean that they shouldn't be included especially in a market like Chicago and I feel the consensus should be modified. Plus, it only seems like Deconstuctthis is the only one to find issue with this any way. Every time I re-added, I got threatened with being blocked permanetly. I don't know who to really write to about this issue. Maybe you can help since it seems that we both feel the same way about this issue. Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Former On air Talent has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Misplaced Pages:Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for mediation concerning WBBM-TV, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible for this dispute to proceed to formal mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Questions relating to the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list. For more information on other available steps in the dispute resolution process, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 21:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Prospect Park

Hi. I have transferred the content you've added to the soap opera to the All My Children article because it is more relevant there. I didn't transfered anything to One Life to Live because that article already talked about the Prospect Park deal.

Regards

Farine (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: List of programs broadcast by Peachtree TV

Hello Tvtonightokc, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of List of programs broadcast by Peachtree TV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Sir Armbrust _Contribs 18:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: WTHI "MyFox10" logo

Sockpuppetry Concerns

I am sorry, but your current edits are exactly like those of a prolific sockpuppet, so I have started an SPI investigation on you for safety's safe. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I knew it wasn't you all along.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Question

I've just got a quick question, but are direct links allowed on the TV Station pages for the news teams? If not, then let me know. If you look at KGET-TV at the last time I edited the page, you can see the direct links. If those aren't allowed, then let me know. The page is fixed without them, but was just wondering. Thanks. (JoeCool950 (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC))

Nomination for deletion of Template:U.S. daytime talkshows

Template:U.S. daytime talkshows has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Ryulong (竜龙) 03:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Network Template TFD 2

You participated in the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_7#Network_templates. A new discussion about the same templates has been restarted at Misplaced Pages:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_19#Network_templates_2. Feel free to express your thoughts at the new discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Las Vegas TV

Please do not add random line ends to templates. If you have a display problem get a working browser. Your screen resolution and size are just that, yours. Don't mess up everyone else's displays. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

It is the job of any readers browser to format and display the content based on the monitor you are using. Your arbitrary line breaks look horrid on a 16:9 monitor. In addition they don't look right on any display if you have the wrong window size. Your line breaks only work for the font you use, the screen size you use, the resolution you have selected and the size of the window you are using. Hence your choice of line breaks is arbitrary. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Cleveland TV stations

Hey!

I like what you did to the Cleveland TV stations, especially the work you did on the on-air talent.

But I'm gonna give you a heads up.

There are a few folks on here that don't like how the talent roster is formatted (I know, because I've tangled with them), and I'll bet will give you a hard time about it.

Just be prepared.

Vjmlhds 00:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Please consider reviewing relevant discussions, such as those for WEWS-TV at Talk:WEWS-TV#Staff and Talk:WEWS-TV#New_format_for_on_air_talent., before making any further changes. Thank you.  Levdr1lostpassword  (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In ABC Spark, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page W (TV channel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In WPMT, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page NewsWatch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

KAYU-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to High definition

KHQ-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to High definition

KXLY-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to High definition

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Dashes

Hi there, thanks for your work on US year-in-TV articles. These are a valuable contribution. I've just gone through applying a few scripts to the past few years; in particular, there's a single-click dash converter (from hyphens in year and other ranges) that you'd find very handy, and that brings an article into compliance with the Manual of Style and most external guidelines (including the US Chicago MoS). Let me know if you want to add it to your functions (you can click the link on my edit-summaries, actually. Thanks. Tony (talk) 12:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 7 Secrets for deletion

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/7 Secrets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please Stop

Please stop adding the Newscast Titles and Station Slogans to television station pages. They have been deemed "unverified, unencyclopedic, and unsourced content" and shouldn't be added. Please stop adding them. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning, stop adding unverified, unencyclopedic, and unsourced content to television station pages. Next time you do, it will be reverted, and you will be taken to AIV for vandalism...as you are teetering on the edge of that right now. I am trying to assume good faith, but when you are asked and then you turn around and do what you were just asked not to do, it makes that very difficult. Stop now or face the consequences. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 20:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Cincy TV

--Chaswmsday (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

AMC (TV channel)

Please don't slice off a section of AMC (TV channel) to make a new article. It's completely redundant. Also you damaged references at AMC (TV channel) with your edits so I reverted your changes. Barsoomian (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

And please don't make radical changes to that article without discussion on the Talk page. Barsoomian (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:ABC Spark

Yes, ABC Spark was originally set to launch on the 26th, however, the channel, as it was reported on other forums, actually fully launched on the 23rd on some carriers like EastLink. So, therefore, the launch date of the channel was actually the 23rd.musimax. (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Morgan (meteorologist) for deletion

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mike Morgan (meteorologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm 23:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summarizes

When making a sizable edit, please explain in the edit summary what you did so it doesn't look like vandalism. Mr. C.C._{I didn't do it!} 21:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

May, 2012

I noticed you have made some recent changes to CICT-DT without explaining the change in the Edit summary. Any future edit on this page without an explanation will be considered vandalism and reverted back to the previous post. Going forward, please refer to Help:Edit summary page to properly educate yourself on how to edit a page, as per standard, to avoid a potential conflicted as has been noted here. If you have any further questions or comments, feel free to tag my talk page. Gsgeek540 (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Sinclair and Fox

The Sinclair-Fox affiliation agreement is for five years, not six. It expires in 2017. That is what your cited source says. JTRH (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Tvtonightokc/KNPN-LD2 has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/KNPN-LD2, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

WJBK edits

You have made some recent edits to the WJBK article which could be arguably unnecessary and without any explination in the edit summery or on the talk page. What is your explination for not leaving these summeries? Based on the other comments left on your talk page this appears to be a recurring issue with the majority of your edits.173.123.174.100 (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!