Misplaced Pages

User talk:Floquenstein's monster

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chedzilla (talk | contribs) at 01:36, 1 August 2012 (5%: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:36, 1 August 2012 by Chedzilla (talk | contribs) (5%: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bread

Bread? Hipocrite (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Bread good! --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 16:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Godwin

I call Godwin. Risker (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Godwin bah! Then came for little arbs praps! bishzilla ROARR!! 18:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC).
("Bah"? Lizard misspell "bad"?) Careful lizard, little arbs look harmless, but have fire. Fire bad. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
What size little monster? Go comfortably in pocket? Now little monster shoot craps with kawaii little arbcom in pocket! bishzilla ROARR!! 20:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC).
Pocket ba... Wait, pocket seem OK. Roomy, warm. Interesting people. Ping pong table nice touch. Pocket good. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Condolences and consolation

Poor little monster sadly abandoned by master! :-( Come join Bishzilla harem for wild sex, little monster! :-) bishzilla ROARR!! 15:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC).

Master only half finish female monster when get all whiny and leave; monster need Plan B. Wild harem sex good. Soon you see - not "little" monster. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Good job the actually very innocent Bishzilla not likely to understand naughty remark by monster! Come here 'Zilla, time for your nap or something! Bishonen | talk 23:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC).
(*confused tone*) Lizard started it! Monster just try keep up. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
(*resigned tone*) Well, I tried to get Bishzilla to "storm out", but she insists on sticking around, ogling the monster and fluttering her eyelashes. I can't understand it <sigh>. The whole family is very difficult. Bishonen | talk 16:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC).
(*Monster practice fluttering eyelashes, but make unromantic thudding sound, so not try with lizard. Thudding eyelashes bad.*) Don't hate monster because beautiful. Monster sorry cause problem for lizard owner, try behave more respectable. (*Monster wonder what offspring of monster and lizard look like, but keep question to self. See? Respectable. *) --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Are those the eyelashes your sockmaster laid out for you? bishzilla ROARR!! 20:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC).
(*leers back*) thud thud thud. (*more concernedly*) Lizard get us in trouble with owner. Or worse, shocking behavior of lizard get owner in trouble with classy Misplaced Pages Community. Not good, since owner now responsible editor again maybe. Monster try be respectable, but difficult if hear such naughty talk. Think lizard maybe violating some talk page guideline somewhere. (don't stop) --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes sir, I can boogie! bishzilla ROARR!! 20:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC).
Monster try decide this be PG-13, R, or NC-17? Feel dizzy, need sit down, need water, need think.
...Good... --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
...to find Bishzilla wearing her boudoir makeup! bishzilla ROARR!! 23:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC).
Inequitable height differential bad. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
'Zilla put on robe and wizard hat! bishzilla ROARR!! 09:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC).
Monster not understand "wizard hat", but otherwise accept this for best. Suggest lizard look for next victim possible companion on List of creatures roughly the same size as Bishzilla (surprise not featured list already), avoid future disappointment. Hope can still be "just friends". --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

since the section is conveniently here already

Glad to be of service. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

It's almost as if you'd traveled forward in time and knew I'd need it... :) --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
What do we want? Time travel
When do we want it? That's irrelevant
Chedzilla (talk) 02:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Lol. Hi Ched. --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Richard Baker

It rarely gets edited, and the socks are blocked when they pop up. I don't believe it should be protected, let alone for six months. Enigma 19:45, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The socks are blocked when they pop up because I happen to have it on my watchlist and report them. The vandalism has stayed there until I log in and see it (sometimes a day later); recent changes patrol hasn't been catching it. It's a BLP, targeted by multiple socks for the same BLP-violating vandalism. I cannot imagine what benefit you see to unprotection, but feel free to do whatever you want. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
There is no benefit to unprotecting a BLP. I don't plan on unprotecting it. I'm just pointing it out. Enigma 20:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, was not aware of bit situation. I withdraw what I said. I should've investigated further for a better understanding of what occurred. Enigma
No apology needed, Enigaman, I'm fairly sure when I look back at this I'll see I'm being too abrupt with you here, sorry. I just didn't want to ask for the bit back, but really disagreed with the initial decision, and it hasn't been the first time. AIV and RFPP can be annoying places from a non-admin POV. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I fully agree. I did a lot of work at both places before becoming admin and it's frustrating to go through the trouble and get turned down. When I first commented, I was saying it didn't meet the standards at RfPP, and I thus would've declined it there. However, that is different than saying I believe it should be unprotected. Regards, Enigma 21:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

5%

Just wanted to say: Welcome back to that 5%. 5% of your work is worth more than 99% of most others. Chedzilla (talk) 03:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

too kind, Ched. Might be short lived; I'm evidently a sub-par admin. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Considering my own below that thread .. you may not be alone. Chedzilla (talk) 01:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)