This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SkeenaR (talk | contribs) at 23:16, 28 April 2006 (→9/11 conspiracy theories). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:16, 28 April 2006 by SkeenaR (talk | contribs) (→9/11 conspiracy theories)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, DCAnderson, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Grandmasterka 04:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
9/11 conspiracy theories
I liked your changes, and I hope we can add them back in gradually. Everything at Misplaced Pages takes forever; no page is ever done. SkeenaR is a decent guy who I usually disagree with, but he's more open to reason than many. I can't think of any more platitudes right now. Tom Harrison 02:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
DC, you put "other than al-qaeda orchestrated the attacks". There are people who believe that the government knew what al-quaeda was up to and let it happen on purpose to justify this war or that policy. That is a conspiracy theory. It is too broad to say that all the alternative theories to what is presented in the official explanation involve someone other than al-quaeda orchestrating the attacks. Just so you know, I didn't make that change just so I could revert one of your edits, please don't think that. But I did disagree with the content. SkeenaR 00:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
BTW, I'm not going to pretend to know what actually happened. It seems to me that the official explanation is a conspiracy theory just like the rest of them, inconsistincies and all, only easier for most to swallow. SkeenaR 02:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Re: Your removal of unsorced OR material (with amusing edit summaries): May I recommend just commenting out the material for now so if sources are found it can be more easily put back in? JoshuaZ 05:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Are you for real? SkeenaR 23:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)